Reviving the AI Liability Directive: Challenges and Prospects

The Future of the AI Liability Directive

The European Commission first published a proposal for an AI Liability Directive (“AILD”) in September 2022 as part of a broader set of initiatives, including proposals for a new Product Liability Directive (“new PLD”) and the EU AI Act. The AILD was designed to introduce uniform rules for certain aspects of non-contractual civil claims related to AI, incorporating disclosure requirements and rebuttable presumptions to streamline the process.

However, unlike the new PLD and EU AI Act, which have both been adopted and are currently in force, the AILD has faced significant stagnation and resistance during its legislative journey.

Recent Developments

On January 21, 2025, the AILD seemed to gain renewed momentum when its rapporteur, Axel Voss, announced a timetable aimed at adopting the AILD by February 2026. This schedule included key dates for consultations, the drafting of a report, amendments, negotiations, and voting. In line with this timetable, a six-week stakeholder consultation commenced on February 3, 2025.

Nevertheless, just days later, on February 11, 2025, the European Commission published its 2025 work programme, which included plans to withdraw the AILD, citing “No foreseeable agreement” on the proposal as the reason. As of now, while the AILD has not been officially withdrawn, the Commission is set to notify the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union of its intentions regarding the withdrawal.

Opposition and Uncertainty

In the Council of the European Union, the AILD has encountered strong opposition from a coalition of countries, which may diminish the likelihood of continued efforts to advance the proposal. In the European Parliament, Voss has criticized the withdrawal plan; however, several influential lawmakers within the European People’s Party (EPP), to which Voss belongs, have also expressed concerns about the AILD.

Despite the AILD not being officially withdrawn and the possibility of revival remaining, the political opposition surrounding it has cast a shadow over its future. Observers will continue to monitor developments closely and provide updates as the situation evolves.

This overview highlights the complexities and challenges surrounding the AILD, emphasizing the need for clarity and consensus in the evolving landscape of AI regulation.

More Insights

CII Advocates for Strong AI Accountability in Financial Services

The Chartered Insurance Institute (CII) has urged for clear accountability frameworks and a skills strategy for the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in financial services. They emphasize the...

Regulating AI in APAC MedTech: Current Trends and Future Directions

The regulatory landscape for AI-enabled MedTech in the Asia Pacific region is still developing, with existing frameworks primarily governing other technologies. While countries like China, Japan, and...

New York’s AI Legislation: Key Changes Employers Must Know

In early 2025, New York proposed the NY AI Act and the AI Consumer Protection Act to regulate the use of artificial intelligence, particularly addressing algorithmic discrimination in employment...

Managing AI Risks: Effective Frameworks for Safe Implementation

This article discusses the importance of AI risk management frameworks to mitigate potential risks associated with artificial intelligence systems. It highlights various types of risks, including...

Essential Insights on the EU Artificial Intelligence Act for Tech Companies

The European Union has introduced the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), which aims to manage the risks and opportunities associated with AI technologies across Europe. This landmark regulation...

South Korea’s Landmark AI Basic Act: A New Era of Regulation

South Korea has established itself as a leader in AI regulation in Asia with the introduction of the AI Basic Act, which creates a comprehensive legal framework for artificial intelligence. This...

EU AI Act and DORA: Mastering Compliance in Financial Services

The EU AI Act and DORA are reshaping how financial entities manage AI risk by introducing new layers of compliance that demand transparency, accountability, and quantifiable risk assessments...

AI Governance: Bridging the Transatlantic Divide

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping economies, societies, and global governance, presenting both significant opportunities and risks. This chapter examines the divergent approaches of...

EU’s Ambitious Plan to Boost AI Development

The EU Commission is launching a new strategy to reduce barriers for the deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) across Europe, aiming to enhance the region's competitiveness on a global scale. The...