The One Big Beautiful Bill Act includes a provision to prohibit state regulation of artificial intelligence (AI), which has drawn criticism from some Republicans, including Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene. This federal preemption of state AI regulation is seen by proponents as necessary to avoid a patchwork of conflicting regulations that could hinder innovation.
The article discusses the potential negative impact of a proposed moratorium on state-level AI regulation, arguing that it could stifle innovation and endanger national security. It emphasizes that states are well-equipped to contribute to the necessary governance infrastructure for AI development.
On June 17, 2025, the Joint California Policy Working Group on AI Frontier Models released a report outlining a comprehensive regulatory framework for frontier artificial intelligence. The recommendations emphasize evidence-based policymaking, transparency, and adaptive regulatory thresholds to influence California’s overall AI governance strategy.
Senator Wiener responded to the Joint California Policy Working Group’s final report on AI governance, emphasizing the need for urgent safety measures while also supporting innovation. He invited stakeholders to collaborate on integrating the report’s recommendations into future legislation.
The EU AI Act is the world’s first comprehensive AI legislation, establishing a risk-based framework that categorizes AI systems into four risk levels, each with specific compliance requirements. This regulation not only applies to businesses operating within the EU but also to those whose AI outputs impact EU citizens, emphasizing the global reach of AI governance.
As the implementation of the AI Act approaches, the European Commission faces pressure from the industry and geopolitical tensions that may lead to delays. The discussion highlights the importance of digital sovereignty and Europe’s need to reduce dependence on American technology while navigating the complexities of tech regulation.
This document discusses the opportunity costs associated with state and local regulations on artificial intelligence (AI). It highlights the potential negative impacts such regulations may have on innovation and economic growth.
UK ministers have delayed proposals to regulate artificial intelligence for at least a year, planning to introduce a comprehensive bill to address safety and copyright concerns. The decision has raised worries about the implications of such delays on the regulation of rapidly advancing AI technologies.
The US House of Representatives has approved a budget package that includes a 10-year moratorium on enforcing state AI laws, which has sparked varying opinions among experts. Many argue that this moratorium could hinder states from implementing necessary regulations to protect citizens from potential harms associated with AI technologies.
Financial services companies face challenges in navigating rapidly evolving AI regulations that differ by jurisdiction, which can hinder innovation. The need for compliance is critical, as any misstep can lead to significant reputational and regulatory consequences.
Take the first steps in your transformation towards international AI compliance.
Our expert sales team is here to answer your questions, just leave your email and we’ll get in touch.
