Prioritizing Governance in Agentic AI Adoption

Governance is the Top Priority for Companies Using Agentic AI Systems

In a recent survey conducted by an API management firm, Gravitee, nearly 80% of IT professionals ranked governance as “extremely important.” This statistic underscores a critical tension within organizations: while there is a strong eagerness to innovate using Agentic AI systems, the primary focus remains on responsible implementation.

Adoption of Agentic AI and LLMs

As of May 1, 2025, organizations are increasingly adopting Agentic AI and Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance operational efficiency and improve customer experiences. The survey, which included responses from 300 technology leaders, developers, and AI practitioners, reveals that 72% of respondents are actively using agentic AI systems today. Furthermore, another 21% plan to implement these systems within the next 24 months, indicating a strong future pipeline.

Driving Factors for Adoption

Among the surveyed participants, nearly 74% selected increasing operational efficiency as the leading driver for implementing agentic AI. This highlights the view of agentic systems as essential tools for automating repetitive tasks, reducing manual overhead, and streamlining internal processes. Other significant factors include:

  • Customer experience (46.23%)
  • Reducing costs (37.74%)

This shift demonstrates that organizations are not only focused on innovation but also on delivering bottom-line results.

Challenges in Implementation

Despite the enthusiasm for agentic AI, organizations face numerous challenges. The survey data indicates that integration with existing systems, along with data privacy and security concerns, are top challenges for companies deploying these systems. Additionally, controlling the costs associated with LLM interactions emerges as the single biggest concern, with more than twice as many respondents prioritizing it over other issues.

The Importance of Governance

A unifying theme across all aspects of agentic AI adoption is the emphasis on governance. A striking 76% of respondents ranked governance as “extremely important,” illustrating the need for organizations to innovate responsibly while managing risks effectively.

Implementation Strategies

The survey reveals that establishing a dedicated agentic AI team is the most common approach, cited by 37.74% of respondents as their primary implementation group. This trend points to the emergence of a new functional specialty within enterprises that combines:

  • Orchestration
  • Prompt engineering
  • Integration strategy
  • Governance

Data science and engineering teams also play significant roles, contributing to 29.87% and 16.98% of implementations, respectively.

Developers’ Preferences

When it comes to operationalizing agents, OpenAI stands out as the dominant choice among developers and organizations due to its robust APIs and ecosystem maturity. Approximately 48.74% of respondents selected OpenAI, while other platforms like Google Vertex AI (10.06%), Microsoft Azure (8.81%), and IBM (8.81%) are also gaining traction. Notably, OpenAI’s ChatGPT has become the de facto entry point for organizations adopting LLMs, with 86.79% of respondents indicating prior usage.

Funding for Agentic AI Initiatives

Funding for agentic AI initiatives appears robust, with nearly half of the respondents (49.06%) reporting that their projects are backed by a net new budget specifically allocated for agentic AI. This trend signals strong executive buy-in and a long-term commitment to AI initiatives. Additionally, 35.53% of respondents are reallocating from existing budgets without cutting into other IT initiatives, suggesting a pragmatic approach of “start small, prove value.”

The largest group of respondents—49.37%—reported an annual spend between $50,000 and $249,999 on LLMs, indicating that many teams are moving beyond the proof-of-concept stage and are now scaling their usage.

Conclusion

The survey results reflect a growing urgency among companies to implement Agentic AI systems and LLMs to enhance productivity and customer experience. However, there is a clear emphasis on caution, particularly regarding governance and control. As organizations become more adept at managing these challenges, the adoption of agentic AI is expected to accelerate even further.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...