NY’s Controversial AI Safety Bill: What it Means for the Industry

AI Safety Regulation Bill Heads to Governor’s Desk

The recent passage of the RAISE Act by New York lawmakers marks a significant step towards the regulation of AI safety at the state level. This bill, focused on ensuring safety protocols for large language model developers, has sparked controversy within the AI industry, particularly among venture capitalists.

Overview of the RAISE Act

Introduced by Democratic Senator Andrew Gounardes, the RAISE Act requires developers of large AI models to establish and publish comprehensive safety protocols and risk evaluations. This legislation also mandates that companies disclose incidents where their AI models have been compromised or exhibit dangerous behaviors. Noncompliance could lead to civil penalties of up to $30 million, enforced by the New York attorney general.

Criteria for Compliance

The new regulations will specifically apply to companies that utilize more than $100 million in computing resources to train their models, thereby targeting only the largest players in the AI landscape.

Industry Reactions

Responses to the RAISE Act have been largely negative from the venture capital community. Critics argue that this legislation could hinder innovation and progress in the rapidly evolving AI sector. Notably, Andreessen Horowitz General Partner Anjney Midha described the bill as “yet another stupid, stupid state level AI bill” that could stifle the U.S. AI industry while global competitors advance without similar restrictions.

Comparison with Previous Legislation

This bill follows California’s failed attempt to regulate AI safety with SB 1047, which faced backlash for imposing stringent requirements such as the inclusion of a “kill switch” for AI models. Concerns over the potential for civil liability for AI-related harms were pivotal in the bill’s downfall.

The Call for Federal Standards

Industry leaders, including co-founder of Anthropic, Jack Clark, have voiced their concerns about the broad scope of the RAISE Act. Clark suggested that while transparency is essential, a uniform federal standard would be preferable to a patchwork of state regulations.

Concluding Thoughts

The RAISE Act’s journey to the desk of Governor Kathy Hochul is closely watched, as her decision could set a precedent for AI regulation in the United States. As the industry grapples with the implications of this legislation, it remains to be seen whether safeguards will enhance user safety or hinder technological advancement.

More Insights

US Rejects UN’s Call for Global AI Governance Framework

U.S. officials rejected the establishment of a global AI governance framework at the United Nations General Assembly, despite broad support from many nations, including China. Michael Kratsios of the...

Agentic AI: Managing the Risks of Autonomous Systems

As companies increasingly adopt agentic AI systems for autonomous decision-making, they face the emerging challenge of agentic AI sprawl, which can lead to security vulnerabilities and operational...

AI as a New Opinion Gatekeeper: Addressing Hidden Biases

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into sectors like healthcare and finance, a new study highlights the potential for subtle biases in AI systems to distort public...

AI Accountability: A New Era of Regulation and Compliance

The burgeoning world of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is at a critical juncture as regulatory actions signal a new era of accountability and ethical deployment. Recent events highlight the shift...

Choosing Effective AI Governance Tools for Safer Adoption

As generative AI continues to evolve, so do the associated risks, making AI governance tools essential for managing these challenges. This initiative, in collaboration with Tokio Marine Group, aims to...

UN Initiatives for Trustworthy AI Governance

The United Nations is working to influence global policy on artificial intelligence by establishing an expert panel to develop standards for "safe, secure and trustworthy" AI. This initiative aims to...

Data-Driven Governance: Shaping AI Regulation in Singapore

The conversation between Thomas Roehm from SAS and Frankie Phua from United Overseas Bank at the SAS Innovate On Tour in Singapore explores how data-driven regulation can effectively govern rapidly...

Preparing SMEs for EU AI Compliance Challenges

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) must navigate the complexities of the EU AI Act, which categorizes many AI applications as "high-risk" and imposes strict compliance requirements. To adapt...

Draft Guidance on Reporting Serious Incidents Under the EU AI Act

On September 26, 2025, the European Commission published draft guidance on serious incident reporting requirements for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act. Organizations developing or deploying...