NY’s Controversial AI Safety Bill: What it Means for the Industry

AI Safety Regulation Bill Heads to Governor’s Desk

The recent passage of the RAISE Act by New York lawmakers marks a significant step towards the regulation of AI safety at the state level. This bill, focused on ensuring safety protocols for large language model developers, has sparked controversy within the AI industry, particularly among venture capitalists.

Overview of the RAISE Act

Introduced by Democratic Senator Andrew Gounardes, the RAISE Act requires developers of large AI models to establish and publish comprehensive safety protocols and risk evaluations. This legislation also mandates that companies disclose incidents where their AI models have been compromised or exhibit dangerous behaviors. Noncompliance could lead to civil penalties of up to $30 million, enforced by the New York attorney general.

Criteria for Compliance

The new regulations will specifically apply to companies that utilize more than $100 million in computing resources to train their models, thereby targeting only the largest players in the AI landscape.

Industry Reactions

Responses to the RAISE Act have been largely negative from the venture capital community. Critics argue that this legislation could hinder innovation and progress in the rapidly evolving AI sector. Notably, Andreessen Horowitz General Partner Anjney Midha described the bill as “yet another stupid, stupid state level AI bill” that could stifle the U.S. AI industry while global competitors advance without similar restrictions.

Comparison with Previous Legislation

This bill follows California’s failed attempt to regulate AI safety with SB 1047, which faced backlash for imposing stringent requirements such as the inclusion of a “kill switch” for AI models. Concerns over the potential for civil liability for AI-related harms were pivotal in the bill’s downfall.

The Call for Federal Standards

Industry leaders, including co-founder of Anthropic, Jack Clark, have voiced their concerns about the broad scope of the RAISE Act. Clark suggested that while transparency is essential, a uniform federal standard would be preferable to a patchwork of state regulations.

Concluding Thoughts

The RAISE Act’s journey to the desk of Governor Kathy Hochul is closely watched, as her decision could set a precedent for AI regulation in the United States. As the industry grapples with the implications of this legislation, it remains to be seen whether safeguards will enhance user safety or hinder technological advancement.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...