NY’s Controversial AI Safety Bill: What it Means for the Industry

AI Safety Regulation Bill Heads to Governor’s Desk

The recent passage of the RAISE Act by New York lawmakers marks a significant step towards the regulation of AI safety at the state level. This bill, focused on ensuring safety protocols for large language model developers, has sparked controversy within the AI industry, particularly among venture capitalists.

Overview of the RAISE Act

Introduced by Democratic Senator Andrew Gounardes, the RAISE Act requires developers of large AI models to establish and publish comprehensive safety protocols and risk evaluations. This legislation also mandates that companies disclose incidents where their AI models have been compromised or exhibit dangerous behaviors. Noncompliance could lead to civil penalties of up to $30 million, enforced by the New York attorney general.

Criteria for Compliance

The new regulations will specifically apply to companies that utilize more than $100 million in computing resources to train their models, thereby targeting only the largest players in the AI landscape.

Industry Reactions

Responses to the RAISE Act have been largely negative from the venture capital community. Critics argue that this legislation could hinder innovation and progress in the rapidly evolving AI sector. Notably, Andreessen Horowitz General Partner Anjney Midha described the bill as “yet another stupid, stupid state level AI bill” that could stifle the U.S. AI industry while global competitors advance without similar restrictions.

Comparison with Previous Legislation

This bill follows California’s failed attempt to regulate AI safety with SB 1047, which faced backlash for imposing stringent requirements such as the inclusion of a “kill switch” for AI models. Concerns over the potential for civil liability for AI-related harms were pivotal in the bill’s downfall.

The Call for Federal Standards

Industry leaders, including co-founder of Anthropic, Jack Clark, have voiced their concerns about the broad scope of the RAISE Act. Clark suggested that while transparency is essential, a uniform federal standard would be preferable to a patchwork of state regulations.

Concluding Thoughts

The RAISE Act’s journey to the desk of Governor Kathy Hochul is closely watched, as her decision could set a precedent for AI regulation in the United States. As the industry grapples with the implications of this legislation, it remains to be seen whether safeguards will enhance user safety or hinder technological advancement.

More Insights

Transforming Corporate Governance: The Impact of the EU AI Act

This research project investigates how the EU Artificial Intelligence Act is transforming corporate governance and accountability frameworks, compelling companies to reconfigure responsibilities and...

AI-Driven Cybersecurity: Bridging the Accountability Gap

As organizations increasingly adopt AI to drive innovation, they face a dual challenge: while AI enhances cybersecurity measures, it simultaneously facilitates more sophisticated cyberattacks. The...

Thailand’s Comprehensive AI Governance Strategy

Thailand is drafting principles for artificial intelligence (AI) legislation aimed at establishing an AI ecosystem and enhancing user protection from potential risks. The legislation will remove legal...

Texas Implements Groundbreaking AI Regulations in Healthcare

Texas has enacted comprehensive AI governance laws, including the Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA) and Senate Bill 1188, which establish a framework for responsible AI...

AI Governance: Balancing Innovation and Oversight

Riskonnect has launched its new AI Governance solution, enabling organizations to manage the risks and compliance obligations of AI technologies while fostering innovation. The solution integrates...

AI Alignment: Ensuring Technology Serves Human Values

Gillian K. Hadfield has been appointed as the Bloomberg Distinguished Professor of AI Alignment and Governance at Johns Hopkins University, where she will focus on ensuring that artificial...

The Ethical Dilemma of Face Swap Technology

As AI technology evolves, face swap tools are increasingly misused for creating non-consensual explicit content, leading to significant ethical, emotional, and legal consequences. This article...

The Illusion of Influence: The EU AI Act’s Global Reach

The EU AI Act, while aiming to set a regulatory framework for artificial intelligence, faces challenges in influencing other countries due to differing legal and cultural values. This has led to the...

The Illusion of Influence: The EU AI Act’s Global Reach

The EU AI Act, while aiming to set a regulatory framework for artificial intelligence, faces challenges in influencing other countries due to differing legal and cultural values. This has led to the...