New York’s RAISE Act: Pioneering AI Safety Standards

AI Accountability Takes Center Stage with the RAISE Act

The New York State Senate has recently passed the Responsible AI Safety and Education Act, commonly referred to as the RAISE Act, which mandates that major generative AI companies publish safety reports and notify consumers of any security incidents. This legislative move aims to hold companies accountable for the ethical implications of their AI technologies, particularly as generative AI becomes increasingly prevalent in various sectors.

Key Provisions of the RAISE Act

If signed into law, the RAISE Act will impose several critical requirements on large AI companies:

  • Publish detailed safety and security reports on their advanced AI models.
  • Report any safety incidents, which may include breaches by external actors or concerning behaviors exhibited by the AI models.
  • Implement safeguards to mitigate risks associated with AI deployment.
  • Avoid deploying frontier models that pose an “unreasonable risk of critical harm.”
  • Undergo third-party audits to ensure compliance with the regulations set forth in the act.

The act empowers the New York State Attorney General to impose civil penalties of up to $30 million on companies that fail to adhere to its requirements. Notably, the bill defines large generative AI companies as those that spend over $100 million on cloud computing resources.

The Balance Between Safety and Innovation

Co-sponsor Senator Andrew Gounardes emphasized that the RAISE Act is designed to foster innovation while maintaining necessary safeguards. He stated, “My RAISE Act ensures AI can flourish while requiring the largest companies to have a safety plan so their products aren’t used to hurt people.” This statement reflects the intention to balance technological advancement with public safety.

However, critics of such legislation argue that stringent measures could stifle innovation and may not fully consider the context in which AI, especially generative AI, is deployed, particularly by smaller companies in high-risk scenarios.

Precedents in AI Legislation

The RAISE Act is not New York’s only recent legislative effort regarding AI. In June, the state became the first to require companies to disclose whether layoffs were attributable to AI technologies. This move marks a significant step in recognizing the impact of AI on employment and labor practices.

The Future of AI Legislation

As the technological landscape evolves, the RAISE Act sets a precedent for accountability in the AI sector. With the growing influence of AI technologies, it is essential for legislation to keep pace with innovation while ensuring that ethical considerations remain at the forefront of development.

The implications of the RAISE Act could potentially reshape how AI companies operate, emphasizing the need for transparency and responsibility in their practices. As this legislation progresses, it will be crucial to monitor its effects on both innovation and public safety in the rapidly advancing field of artificial intelligence.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...