New York’s RAISE Act: Pioneering AI Safety Standards

AI Accountability Takes Center Stage with the RAISE Act

The New York State Senate has recently passed the Responsible AI Safety and Education Act, commonly referred to as the RAISE Act, which mandates that major generative AI companies publish safety reports and notify consumers of any security incidents. This legislative move aims to hold companies accountable for the ethical implications of their AI technologies, particularly as generative AI becomes increasingly prevalent in various sectors.

Key Provisions of the RAISE Act

If signed into law, the RAISE Act will impose several critical requirements on large AI companies:

  • Publish detailed safety and security reports on their advanced AI models.
  • Report any safety incidents, which may include breaches by external actors or concerning behaviors exhibited by the AI models.
  • Implement safeguards to mitigate risks associated with AI deployment.
  • Avoid deploying frontier models that pose an “unreasonable risk of critical harm.”
  • Undergo third-party audits to ensure compliance with the regulations set forth in the act.

The act empowers the New York State Attorney General to impose civil penalties of up to $30 million on companies that fail to adhere to its requirements. Notably, the bill defines large generative AI companies as those that spend over $100 million on cloud computing resources.

The Balance Between Safety and Innovation

Co-sponsor Senator Andrew Gounardes emphasized that the RAISE Act is designed to foster innovation while maintaining necessary safeguards. He stated, “My RAISE Act ensures AI can flourish while requiring the largest companies to have a safety plan so their products aren’t used to hurt people.” This statement reflects the intention to balance technological advancement with public safety.

However, critics of such legislation argue that stringent measures could stifle innovation and may not fully consider the context in which AI, especially generative AI, is deployed, particularly by smaller companies in high-risk scenarios.

Precedents in AI Legislation

The RAISE Act is not New York’s only recent legislative effort regarding AI. In June, the state became the first to require companies to disclose whether layoffs were attributable to AI technologies. This move marks a significant step in recognizing the impact of AI on employment and labor practices.

The Future of AI Legislation

As the technological landscape evolves, the RAISE Act sets a precedent for accountability in the AI sector. With the growing influence of AI technologies, it is essential for legislation to keep pace with innovation while ensuring that ethical considerations remain at the forefront of development.

The implications of the RAISE Act could potentially reshape how AI companies operate, emphasizing the need for transparency and responsibility in their practices. As this legislation progresses, it will be crucial to monitor its effects on both innovation and public safety in the rapidly advancing field of artificial intelligence.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...