New Jersey Moves to Ban AI in Mental Health Therapy

Counseling by Chatbot: New Jersey Legislators Act to Ban AI in Therapy

A new bill proposed in New Jersey seeks to prohibit the use of artificial intelligence (AI) as a substitute for licensed mental health professionals. This legislative move comes amid growing concerns regarding the safety and efficacy of AI in providing mental health support.

Legislative Background

On June 17, 2025, the Assembly Science, Innovation and Technology Committee in New Jersey advanced a measure that would outlaw the practice of AI therapy under the state’s Consumer Fraud Act. Companies that violate this law would face significant penalties, including fines of up to $10,000 for a first offense and up to $20,000 for subsequent violations.

The Rise of AI in Mental Health

The legislation arrives at a time when many individuals are increasingly turning to AI chatbots for mental health advice and treatment. These chatbots present a low-cost and insurance-free alternative for those seeking help. However, this trend raises important questions about the quality of care provided by such technologies.

According to a report from Mental Health America, approximately one in three people in the U.S. reside in areas with a shortage of mental health professionals, with low-income communities and communities of color being disproportionately affected. This gap in available resources has led some to consider AI-based solutions as a potential remedy.

Concerns About AI Therapy

Despite the accessibility that AI therapy chatbots offer, they come with inherent risks. A study conducted by Stanford University highlighted that while these chatbots can make therapy more accessible, they do not match the effectiveness of human therapists. Furthermore, the study indicated that AI chatbots may exacerbate stigma surrounding certain conditions, such as alcoholism and schizophrenia, in contrast to conditions like depression.

Regulatory Environment

The proposed bill signifies a proactive approach by state lawmakers to regulate AI technologies and mitigate potential harms. However, this initiative could face challenges from broader federal regulations. Notably, President Donald Trump has proposed a “big beautiful bill” that includes a 10-year moratorium on local and state AI laws, which threatens to complicate state-level efforts to manage AI’s impact on mental health.

Previous Legislative Actions

New Jersey’s legislative body has already taken steps to regulate AI technologies. In April, Governor Phil Murphy signed a law criminalizing the creation and dissemination of AI-generated media, commonly referred to as deepfakes. This law imposes penalties of up to five years in prison for offenders. At least 20 states enacted similar laws in the previous year to regulate political deepfakes, indicating a growing trend toward tighter control of AI technologies.

Conclusion

The proposed ban on AI in therapy in New Jersey reflects a critical evaluation of the role of technology in mental health. While AI may offer accessible solutions for many, the potential risks and ethical considerations necessitate careful consideration and regulation. As the debate continues, the mental health field must balance innovation with the imperative to provide safe and effective care.

More Insights

Transforming Corporate Governance: The Impact of the EU AI Act

This research project investigates how the EU Artificial Intelligence Act is transforming corporate governance and accountability frameworks, compelling companies to reconfigure responsibilities and...

AI-Driven Cybersecurity: Bridging the Accountability Gap

As organizations increasingly adopt AI to drive innovation, they face a dual challenge: while AI enhances cybersecurity measures, it simultaneously facilitates more sophisticated cyberattacks. The...

Thailand’s Comprehensive AI Governance Strategy

Thailand is drafting principles for artificial intelligence (AI) legislation aimed at establishing an AI ecosystem and enhancing user protection from potential risks. The legislation will remove legal...

Texas Implements Groundbreaking AI Regulations in Healthcare

Texas has enacted comprehensive AI governance laws, including the Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA) and Senate Bill 1188, which establish a framework for responsible AI...

AI Governance: Balancing Innovation and Oversight

Riskonnect has launched its new AI Governance solution, enabling organizations to manage the risks and compliance obligations of AI technologies while fostering innovation. The solution integrates...

AI Alignment: Ensuring Technology Serves Human Values

Gillian K. Hadfield has been appointed as the Bloomberg Distinguished Professor of AI Alignment and Governance at Johns Hopkins University, where she will focus on ensuring that artificial...

The Ethical Dilemma of Face Swap Technology

As AI technology evolves, face swap tools are increasingly misused for creating non-consensual explicit content, leading to significant ethical, emotional, and legal consequences. This article...

The Illusion of Influence: The EU AI Act’s Global Reach

The EU AI Act, while aiming to set a regulatory framework for artificial intelligence, faces challenges in influencing other countries due to differing legal and cultural values. This has led to the...

The Illusion of Influence: The EU AI Act’s Global Reach

The EU AI Act, while aiming to set a regulatory framework for artificial intelligence, faces challenges in influencing other countries due to differing legal and cultural values. This has led to the...