Kazakhstan’s Bold Step Towards Human-Centric AI Regulation

Kazakhstan’s Ambitious AI Regulation: A Human-Centric Approach

With its draft ‘Law on Artificial Intelligence’ approved in May, Kazakhstan is setting an ambitious course to regulate AI with a focus on human-centric principles. This initiative comes as the Central Asian nation seeks to establish a framework that not only aligns with global trends but also reflects its own national values.

Reflecting Global Trends

The head of the Centre for Public Legislation and Public Administration, Shoplan Saimova, stated, “The bill reflects major global trends in AI regulation.” The EU’s AI Act serves as a model, and Kazakhstan aims to lead rather than follow, creating a system that builds trust between humans and algorithms while safeguarding public interests.

Broad Consultation for Development

The development of this law involved extensive consultation with stakeholders, including lawmakers, tech experts, and industry representatives. This collaborative approach highlights a robust cross-sector backing for the initiative, which aims to regulate AI across various societal domains.

Core Principles of the Legislation

The draft legislation is built on fundamental principles such as:

  • Fairness
  • Legality
  • Accountability
  • Human well-being

Notably, the law prohibits unauthorized data collection and considers imposing criminal liability for significant misuse of AI systems that pose risks to the public.

Impact on Workforce and Training

This legislation could reshape the workforce in Kazakhstan. Experts emphasize the urgent necessity to retrain IT professionals, especially in areas like AI system design and digital ethics. The government recognizes that a responsible approach to AI can foster economic growth while prioritizing human rights.

Legal Framework and Human Rights Concerns

Igor Rogov, the head of Kazakhstan’s human rights commission, has raised important questions regarding accountability in AI systems. Key concerns include:

  • Who is responsible when AI causes harm?
  • Who owns content generated by AI?
  • How can we prevent AI from being utilized for fraud or deception?

The judiciary in Kazakhstan has begun integrating AI to draft decisions in civil cases, indicating the early stages of AI adoption in public institutions while ensuring judges retain final authority.

Challenges and Regulatory Gaps

A recent academic study conducted by five Kazakh scholars offers a comparative legal analysis of Kazakhstan’s draft AI legislation and the EU’s AI Act. While Kazakhstan adopts several elements of a risk-based approach, the framework is found to be lacking in:

  • Clear risk classification systems
  • Requirements for algorithmic transparency
  • Robust personal data protections
  • Strong institutional enforcement mechanisms

The authors of the study suggest that Kazakhstan should selectively adopt components of the EU model, adjusting them to fit the national legal framework. Establishing clear regulatory standards and enhancing institutional capacity are deemed necessary for ensuring compliance.

Transparency and Public Education

The unique challenges posed by Kazakhstan’s media landscape and multilingual environment necessitate that transparency and accountability efforts are supported by public education and sufficient technical infrastructure.

Conclusion: Towards a Responsible AI Ecosystem

While the legal efforts to regulate AI in Kazakhstan are promising, further work is needed. By drawing insights from the EU’s experiences, Kazakhstan can strive to establish a responsible and trusted AI ecosystem—one that not only protects citizens’ rights but also attracts global partnerships and investment.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...