Industry Concerns Mount Over EU’s Draft AI Code

EU Draft AI Code Faces Industry Pushback

The draft Code of Practice on General-Purpose Artificial Intelligence (GPAI) has recently sparked considerable debate within the tech industry as it aims to assist AI companies in aligning with the EU’s AI Act. The draft focuses on several critical areas, including transparency, copyright, risk assessment, and mitigation.

Key Concerns Raised by the Industry

Industry representatives have expressed serious concerns regarding the newly released draft. They argue that the proposed rules may hinder innovation by imposing burdensome requirements that extend beyond the original AI Act’s scope. Among the most contentious points are the mandatory third-party risk assessments that must be conducted both before and after deployment, which many view as unnecessary.

Copyright Issues

Copyright obligations are at the forefront of the industry’s pushback. Organizations such as News Media Europe have voiced their concerns that the draft fails to respect existing copyright laws. They argue that AI companies should not merely be expected to make ‘best efforts’ to avoid using content without proper authorization. This issue is particularly pressing as AI technology increasingly interacts with content creation and distribution.

Fundamental Rights Risks

Another significant criticism of the draft is its perceived inadequacy in addressing fundamental rights risks. Experts contend that these risks should be a primary concern for AI model providers, yet the draft does not sufficiently address them. This oversight could lead to potential violations and ethical dilemmas in AI deployment.

Next Steps and Feedback Period

The draft is currently open for feedback until 30 March, with a final version expected to be released in May. The timeline raises questions regarding the European Commission’s ability to formalize the Code under the AI Act, which is set to come into full effect in 2027. The ongoing discussions and feedback will play a crucial role in shaping the final regulations.

As the debate unfolds, the issue of copyright in relation to AI is also being closely examined by the European Parliament. The outcome of these discussions could have significant implications for the future of AI innovation and regulation in Europe.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...