Industry Concerns Mount Over EU’s Draft AI Code

EU Draft AI Code Faces Industry Pushback

The draft Code of Practice on General-Purpose Artificial Intelligence (GPAI) has recently sparked considerable debate within the tech industry as it aims to assist AI companies in aligning with the EU’s AI Act. The draft focuses on several critical areas, including transparency, copyright, risk assessment, and mitigation.

Key Concerns Raised by the Industry

Industry representatives have expressed serious concerns regarding the newly released draft. They argue that the proposed rules may hinder innovation by imposing burdensome requirements that extend beyond the original AI Act’s scope. Among the most contentious points are the mandatory third-party risk assessments that must be conducted both before and after deployment, which many view as unnecessary.

Copyright Issues

Copyright obligations are at the forefront of the industry’s pushback. Organizations such as News Media Europe have voiced their concerns that the draft fails to respect existing copyright laws. They argue that AI companies should not merely be expected to make ‘best efforts’ to avoid using content without proper authorization. This issue is particularly pressing as AI technology increasingly interacts with content creation and distribution.

Fundamental Rights Risks

Another significant criticism of the draft is its perceived inadequacy in addressing fundamental rights risks. Experts contend that these risks should be a primary concern for AI model providers, yet the draft does not sufficiently address them. This oversight could lead to potential violations and ethical dilemmas in AI deployment.

Next Steps and Feedback Period

The draft is currently open for feedback until 30 March, with a final version expected to be released in May. The timeline raises questions regarding the European Commission’s ability to formalize the Code under the AI Act, which is set to come into full effect in 2027. The ongoing discussions and feedback will play a crucial role in shaping the final regulations.

As the debate unfolds, the issue of copyright in relation to AI is also being closely examined by the European Parliament. The outcome of these discussions could have significant implications for the future of AI innovation and regulation in Europe.

More Insights

CII Advocates for Strong AI Accountability in Financial Services

The Chartered Insurance Institute (CII) has urged for clear accountability frameworks and a skills strategy for the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in financial services. They emphasize the...

Regulating AI in APAC MedTech: Current Trends and Future Directions

The regulatory landscape for AI-enabled MedTech in the Asia Pacific region is still developing, with existing frameworks primarily governing other technologies. While countries like China, Japan, and...

New York’s AI Legislation: Key Changes Employers Must Know

In early 2025, New York proposed the NY AI Act and the AI Consumer Protection Act to regulate the use of artificial intelligence, particularly addressing algorithmic discrimination in employment...

Managing AI Risks: Effective Frameworks for Safe Implementation

This article discusses the importance of AI risk management frameworks to mitigate potential risks associated with artificial intelligence systems. It highlights various types of risks, including...

Essential Insights on the EU Artificial Intelligence Act for Tech Companies

The European Union has introduced the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), which aims to manage the risks and opportunities associated with AI technologies across Europe. This landmark regulation...

South Korea’s Landmark AI Basic Act: A New Era of Regulation

South Korea has established itself as a leader in AI regulation in Asia with the introduction of the AI Basic Act, which creates a comprehensive legal framework for artificial intelligence. This...

EU AI Act and DORA: Mastering Compliance in Financial Services

The EU AI Act and DORA are reshaping how financial entities manage AI risk by introducing new layers of compliance that demand transparency, accountability, and quantifiable risk assessments...

AI Governance: Bridging the Transatlantic Divide

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping economies, societies, and global governance, presenting both significant opportunities and risks. This chapter examines the divergent approaches of...

EU’s Ambitious Plan to Boost AI Development

The EU Commission is launching a new strategy to reduce barriers for the deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) across Europe, aiming to enhance the region's competitiveness on a global scale. The...