EU’s AI Act Draft: Navigating New Challenges for Tech Companies

EU Unveils Fresh Draft of AI Act Rules

The European Union has recently published a new draft of rules concerning the use of general-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) models. This draft addresses technologies such as OpenAI’s GPT-4 and Mistral’s Large, but critics continue to voice significant concerns regarding the implications for tech companies operating within the EU.

Overview of the AI Act

The AI Act is positioned to be the most comprehensive set of laws governing AI technology globally. It introduces a multitude of new regulations for organizations utilizing AI within the EU, emphasizing ethics, safety, and transparency.

Key Developments

Since late last year, stakeholders from various sectors—including industry, academia, and nonprofits—have been engaged in discussions surrounding a pivotal document: the code of practice for general-purpose AI (GPAI).

On March 11, 2025, the European Commission unveiled the third draft of this code of practice. Noteworthy proposals include:

  • Opening up AI companies’ training data to investigate potential copyright breaches.
  • Permitting external experts to inspect models for safety compliance.

Industry Concerns

Despite the advances in the draft, there remain critical issues. Boniface de Champris, a senior policy manager at the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) Europe, voiced strong concerns about the implications for tech firms. He stated, “Serious issues remain, including far-ranging obligations regarding copyright and transparency, which would threaten trade secrets.”

Moreover, the draft continues to impose burdensome external risk assessments, which many industry insiders believe could hinder innovation.

Implications for Digital Competitiveness

De Champris further remarked, “The new draft makes limited progress from its highly problematic predecessor, yet the GPAI Code continues to fall short of providing companies with the legal certainty that’s needed to drive AI innovation in Europe.”

In its current state, the AI Act poses risks that could directly undermine the EU’s digital competitiveness, creating uncertainty for companies looking to invest in the region.

As discussions continue, the balance between regulation and innovation remains a critical focal point for all stakeholders involved in the evolving landscape of artificial intelligence.

More Insights

US Rejects UN’s Call for Global AI Governance Framework

U.S. officials rejected the establishment of a global AI governance framework at the United Nations General Assembly, despite broad support from many nations, including China. Michael Kratsios of the...

Agentic AI: Managing the Risks of Autonomous Systems

As companies increasingly adopt agentic AI systems for autonomous decision-making, they face the emerging challenge of agentic AI sprawl, which can lead to security vulnerabilities and operational...

AI as a New Opinion Gatekeeper: Addressing Hidden Biases

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into sectors like healthcare and finance, a new study highlights the potential for subtle biases in AI systems to distort public...

AI Accountability: A New Era of Regulation and Compliance

The burgeoning world of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is at a critical juncture as regulatory actions signal a new era of accountability and ethical deployment. Recent events highlight the shift...

Choosing Effective AI Governance Tools for Safer Adoption

As generative AI continues to evolve, so do the associated risks, making AI governance tools essential for managing these challenges. This initiative, in collaboration with Tokio Marine Group, aims to...

UN Initiatives for Trustworthy AI Governance

The United Nations is working to influence global policy on artificial intelligence by establishing an expert panel to develop standards for "safe, secure and trustworthy" AI. This initiative aims to...

Data-Driven Governance: Shaping AI Regulation in Singapore

The conversation between Thomas Roehm from SAS and Frankie Phua from United Overseas Bank at the SAS Innovate On Tour in Singapore explores how data-driven regulation can effectively govern rapidly...

Preparing SMEs for EU AI Compliance Challenges

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) must navigate the complexities of the EU AI Act, which categorizes many AI applications as "high-risk" and imposes strict compliance requirements. To adapt...

Draft Guidance on Reporting Serious Incidents Under the EU AI Act

On September 26, 2025, the European Commission published draft guidance on serious incident reporting requirements for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act. Organizations developing or deploying...