EU Commission’s Contingency Plans for AI Standards Delays

EU Commission’s Preparedness for AI Standards Delays

The European Commission is poised to take action should there be delays in the technical standards necessary for companies to demonstrate compliance with the EU AI Act. A spokesperson for the Commission indicated the possibility of providing alternative solutions if these standards are not finalized on time.

Current Status of AI Standards

According to recent reports, the primary bodies responsible for drafting the standards under the AI Act, namely CEN-CENELEC, are currently behind schedule. Initially, these standards were expected to be ready by August 2025, but have now been pushed back to 2026.

Regrettably, this delay may pose challenges for companies striving to meet compliance requirements. The spokesperson, Thomas Regnier, outlined the Commission’s readiness to consider temporary measures to support providers in maintaining compliance amidst these setbacks.

Implications of Delayed Standards

The AI Act aims to regulate high-risk applications of artificial intelligence, ensuring that products and services are safe and trustworthy. However, it is important to note that the standards drafted are not mandatory. Providers can still develop high-risk AI systems even in the absence of these standards.

Nonetheless, having these standards in place is deemed crucial. Regnier emphasized that they will significantly facilitate compliance efforts for providers, making adherence to the regulations more manageable.

Next Steps in the Standards Development Process

As the year progresses, the first drafts of the standards are expected to be released. These drafts will undergo a rigorous process of editing, assessment by the Commission, and will require consultations and votes before they can be finalized.

The AI Act became applicable in August 2023, with full implementation anticipated by 2027. The Commission’s proactive approach aims to ensure that both providers and conformity assessment bodies are adequately prepared ahead of the legal requirements coming into effect, particularly those set for August 2026.

Conclusion

In summary, the European Commission’s readiness to implement alternative solutions highlights the importance of timely standardization for AI technologies. As the landscape of AI regulation continues to evolve, the emphasis remains on ensuring safety, trustworthiness, and compliance in high-risk AI applications.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...