Diverging Paths in Global AI Regulation

AI Regulation Developments: A Global Perspective

Major nations are experiencing a divergence in their approach to artificial intelligence (AI) regulation. As Australia pushes for stringent oversight, the European Union (EU) is racing to implement its AI Act, while OpenAI prepares to unveil a national AI strategy in the United States. This regulatory divide emerges at a time when financial institutions are accelerating their integration of AI technology, highlighting the contrasting ideologies between countries advocating for tight controls versus those favoring a more laissez-faire approach.

EU Opens Consultation on AI

The European AI Office has launched a targeted consultation aimed at developing official guidelines for the EU’s new AI law. This consultation, running from November 13 to December 11, focuses on two pivotal areas of the AI Act: defining what constitutes an AI system and identifying prohibited AI practices under the new regulations.

According to the European Commission, the objective of these guidelines is to provide consistent interpretation and practical guidance to assist competent authorities in enforcement actions, as well as to help providers and deployers comply with the AI Act. The commission is particularly seeking real-world examples from stakeholders, including businesses, academic institutions, and civil society organizations.

The timing of this consultation is crucial, as specific provisions of the AI Act will come into effect on February 2, 2025, six months after the law’s initial implementation date. Feedback from this consultation will be instrumental in shaping comprehensive guidelines expected to be released in early 2025.

Australia Stands Firm on AI

Australia’s industry minister has reaffirmed the country’s commitment to advancing its AI and social media regulations, despite potential opposition from the incoming Trump administration. Minister Ed Husic emphasized Australia’s resolve to establish protective “guardrails” for high-risk AI applications, mirroring the EU’s regulatory framework.

This position starkly contrasts with Donald Trump’s campaign promises to roll back existing AI regulations. Husic stated, “We have a job we’ve said we’ll do for the public, and there’s an expectation. … We will continue to do that, and we will.” The upcoming policy adjustments may include new legislation empowering the Communications and Media Authority to enhance social media companies’ responses to misinformation.

The regulatory landscape could become more complex due to the influence of key figures such as Elon Musk, who opposes social media regulations, and Vice President-elect JD Vance, who has cautioned NATO allies against restricting free speech on Musk’s platforms. Nevertheless, Husic remains steadfast in Australia’s regulatory commitment, focusing on public safety and the country’s sovereign interests.

OpenAI to Present AI Plan

OpenAI is set to unveil an ambitious national AI infrastructure plan in Washington, aimed at maintaining America’s competitive edge in the AI sector. The proposed strategy includes the establishment of specialized economic zones where states can expedite permits for AI facilities in return for providing computational resources to public universities.

A significant focus of the plan is to expand energy capacity, especially in the Midwest and Southwest regions. OpenAI’s head of global policy, Chris Lehane, indicated that the U.S. AI industry will require approximately 50 gigawatts of power by 2030, equivalent to the output of 50 nuclear reactors. The proposal advocates for leveraging U.S. Navy nuclear expertise for civilian reactor projects and establishing a National Transmission Highway Act to modernize power infrastructure.

Additionally, the plan envisions forming a North American AI alliance that may eventually encompass other Western nations and Gulf states. This initiative arrives at a critical juncture, as the incoming Trump administration plans to repeal President Biden’s AI executive order, instead promoting policies that underscore “Free Speech and Human Flourishing.”

OpenAI’s blueprint underscores the foundational nature of AI in modern society, likening its importance to that of electricity, necessitating widespread access and equitable benefits for all.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...