Delays in the EU AI Act: Standards Development Pushed to 2026

Delays in the Development of the EU AI Act Standards

The development of technical standards necessary for companies to demonstrate compliance with the EU’s AI Act is currently behind schedule, as reported by the main standardization bodies, CEN and CENELEC.

Background on the AI Act

In 2023, the European Commission requested that these organizations begin work on the technical standards that would allow manufacturers to prove that their products, services, or processes are compliant with the AI Act’s regulations. These standards are crucial for ensuring that AI applications are safe, trustworthy, and compliant with the established rules.

Current Status of Standards Development

Originally, the standards were expected to be completed by August 2025. However, CEN-CENELEC has indicated that, based on current project plans, this timeline will be extended into 2026. The organization emphasized the need to reflect the state of the art in AI technologies and to achieve consensus among European stakeholders during this process.

Process of Finalizing Standards

Once the initial drafts of the standards are ready later this year, they will undergo mandatory editing rounds, an assessment by the Commission, and will also require consultations and votes. This comprehensive procedure is projected to occupy much of 2025 and possibly extend into 2026 for some deliverables.

CEN-CENELEC has announced that they are implementing extraordinary measures to streamline the development timelines while maintaining close discussions with the AI Office.

Implications of the AI Act

The AI Act, which aims to regulate high-risk applications, became applicable in August 2024 and is gradually being implemented. The full enforcement of the act is slated for 2027.

By August 2025, member states are expected to establish national regulators responsible for overseeing compliance at the domestic level. These regulators will collaborate with the Commission’s AI Office, which operates within DG Connect.

Concerns from Regulatory Bodies

In a recent interview, a senior official from the Dutch data protection authority, which will oversee a portion of the AI Act in the Netherlands, expressed concerns about the ongoing process. The official highlighted that the standards are intended to provide certainty for companies and enable them to demonstrate compliance. However, they noted that there remains considerable work to be done before the standards are finalized, emphasizing that time is running out.

The development of these standards is critical for fostering trust and ensuring that AI technologies are implemented safely and responsibly within the European market.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...