Confusion Surrounds Future of the AI Act Amid Digital Package Plans

Commission Line Confused on Potential AI Act Re-Opening

The ongoing discussions surrounding the AI Act have caused some confusion within the Commission, as recent statements suggest a tentative approach to the future of EU AI regulation.

Context and Background

As part of the Commission’s digital package, the AI Act is set to undergo an impact assessment by the end of the year, as indicated by AI Office director Lucilla Sioli. This package aims to address the balance between regulation and the need for investment and growth within the AI sector.

During the recent AI Summit, regulation took a back seat, raising concerns about the future trajectory of EU AI legislation, especially in light of the growing emphasis on innovation and development.

Key Points from the Panel Discussion

In a panel discussion on privacy and AI, Sioli elaborated on the Commission’s plans regarding the digital package. She clarified that while the AI Act will be included as part of this omnibus package, stakeholders should not expect any major review of the Act itself. Instead, the focus appears to be on simplifying certain aspects specifically for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

Sioli emphasized that the assessment would likely concentrate on the intersections with other existing legislation, hinting at a more integrated approach to regulation.

Uncertainty Surrounding Re-Opening of the AI Act

Despite these discussions, significant ambiguity remains about whether the AI Act will actually be re-opened. The Commission previously indicated that the legislation would be evaluated to determine if the expanded digital acquis sufficiently meets the needs of businesses, particularly SMEs and small midcaps.

Moreover, the digital package is expected to also address crucial topics such as cybersecurity reporting and data-sharing rules, as confirmed by Commissioner Šefčovič during a press conference.

Official Responses and Future Implications

At the press conference, Šefčovič referred to the digital package as an “omnibus,” despite previous assertions that it would not be categorized as such. This inconsistency has further fueled speculation regarding the Commission’s intentions.

When pressed for clarity, Commission spokesperson Thomas Regnier stated, “I cannot confirm that the Commission will reopen the AI Act,” leaving stakeholders in a state of uncertainty regarding the future of AI regulation in the EU.

As the situation evolves, the implications for businesses and the broader tech landscape remain to be seen, with the potential for significant regulatory adjustments that could shape the development of AI technologies in Europe.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...