Confusion Surrounds Future of the AI Act Amid Digital Package Plans

Commission Line Confused on Potential AI Act Re-Opening

The ongoing discussions surrounding the AI Act have caused some confusion within the Commission, as recent statements suggest a tentative approach to the future of EU AI regulation.

Context and Background

As part of the Commission’s digital package, the AI Act is set to undergo an impact assessment by the end of the year, as indicated by AI Office director Lucilla Sioli. This package aims to address the balance between regulation and the need for investment and growth within the AI sector.

During the recent AI Summit, regulation took a back seat, raising concerns about the future trajectory of EU AI legislation, especially in light of the growing emphasis on innovation and development.

Key Points from the Panel Discussion

In a panel discussion on privacy and AI, Sioli elaborated on the Commission’s plans regarding the digital package. She clarified that while the AI Act will be included as part of this omnibus package, stakeholders should not expect any major review of the Act itself. Instead, the focus appears to be on simplifying certain aspects specifically for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

Sioli emphasized that the assessment would likely concentrate on the intersections with other existing legislation, hinting at a more integrated approach to regulation.

Uncertainty Surrounding Re-Opening of the AI Act

Despite these discussions, significant ambiguity remains about whether the AI Act will actually be re-opened. The Commission previously indicated that the legislation would be evaluated to determine if the expanded digital acquis sufficiently meets the needs of businesses, particularly SMEs and small midcaps.

Moreover, the digital package is expected to also address crucial topics such as cybersecurity reporting and data-sharing rules, as confirmed by Commissioner Šefčovič during a press conference.

Official Responses and Future Implications

At the press conference, Šefčovič referred to the digital package as an “omnibus,” despite previous assertions that it would not be categorized as such. This inconsistency has further fueled speculation regarding the Commission’s intentions.

When pressed for clarity, Commission spokesperson Thomas Regnier stated, “I cannot confirm that the Commission will reopen the AI Act,” leaving stakeholders in a state of uncertainty regarding the future of AI regulation in the EU.

As the situation evolves, the implications for businesses and the broader tech landscape remain to be seen, with the potential for significant regulatory adjustments that could shape the development of AI technologies in Europe.

More Insights

US Rejects UN’s Call for Global AI Governance Framework

U.S. officials rejected the establishment of a global AI governance framework at the United Nations General Assembly, despite broad support from many nations, including China. Michael Kratsios of the...

Agentic AI: Managing the Risks of Autonomous Systems

As companies increasingly adopt agentic AI systems for autonomous decision-making, they face the emerging challenge of agentic AI sprawl, which can lead to security vulnerabilities and operational...

AI as a New Opinion Gatekeeper: Addressing Hidden Biases

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into sectors like healthcare and finance, a new study highlights the potential for subtle biases in AI systems to distort public...

AI Accountability: A New Era of Regulation and Compliance

The burgeoning world of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is at a critical juncture as regulatory actions signal a new era of accountability and ethical deployment. Recent events highlight the shift...

Choosing Effective AI Governance Tools for Safer Adoption

As generative AI continues to evolve, so do the associated risks, making AI governance tools essential for managing these challenges. This initiative, in collaboration with Tokio Marine Group, aims to...

UN Initiatives for Trustworthy AI Governance

The United Nations is working to influence global policy on artificial intelligence by establishing an expert panel to develop standards for "safe, secure and trustworthy" AI. This initiative aims to...

Data-Driven Governance: Shaping AI Regulation in Singapore

The conversation between Thomas Roehm from SAS and Frankie Phua from United Overseas Bank at the SAS Innovate On Tour in Singapore explores how data-driven regulation can effectively govern rapidly...

Preparing SMEs for EU AI Compliance Challenges

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) must navigate the complexities of the EU AI Act, which categorizes many AI applications as "high-risk" and imposes strict compliance requirements. To adapt...

Draft Guidance on Reporting Serious Incidents Under the EU AI Act

On September 26, 2025, the European Commission published draft guidance on serious incident reporting requirements for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act. Organizations developing or deploying...