Blueprint for Global AI Governance

Global AI Stewardship Initiative (GASI): A Blueprint for Responsible AI Governance

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents unprecedented opportunities and challenges. Harnessing the transformative power of AI while mitigating its potential risks requires a robust global framework for responsible AI development and deployment.

This study proposes the establishment of the Global AI Stewardship Initiative (GASI), a pioneering international body designed to set standards, drive compliance, and foster collaboration among nations and stakeholders in the pursuit of ethical and beneficial AI.

The Imperative for Global AI Governance

AI’s impact transcends national borders, demanding a coordinated global response. Fragmented approaches risk regulatory inconsistencies, hindering innovation and potentially leading to harmful consequences. GASI addresses this need by providing a unified platform for:

  • Establishing Ethical Guidelines: Defining globally accepted principles for AI development and use, ensuring fairness, transparency, accountability, and respect for human rights.
  • Developing Technical Standards: Creating standardized methodologies for data governance, risk assessment, model validation, and explainability, promoting interoperability and trust in AI systems.
  • Fostering International Cooperation: Facilitating dialogue and collaboration among nations, fostering knowledge sharing and preventing a “race to the bottom” in AI regulation.
  • Building Public Trust: Demonstrating a commitment to responsible AI, increasing public confidence in the technology and its potential benefits.

Introducing GASI: A Multi-Stakeholder Approach

GASI is envisioned as a global body with a multi-stakeholder governance structure, encompassing:

  • General Assembly: The ultimate decision-making body, comprised of representatives from AI-adopting countries (member states), including government, industry, academia, and civil society.
  • Governing Council: An elected body from the General Assembly, responsible for strategic oversight and operational guidance.
  • Secretariat: A permanent administrative body supporting the Governing Council and implementing GASI’s programs.
  • Expert Panels: Leading experts in AI, ethics, law, and other relevant fields, advising GASI on technical and ethical matters.
  • Stakeholder Advisory Board: A formalized structure for ongoing input from diverse stakeholder groups.

GASI’s Core Functions

GASI’s mandate encompasses several key functions:

  • Standards Development: Developing and maintaining globally recognized standards for responsible AI, including:
    • AI Ethics Principles: Defining core ethical principles, encompassing data minimization, purpose limitation (GDPR), and human oversight.
    • Technical Standards: Establishing standards for data governance (GDPR aligned), risk assessment (FAIR aligned), model validation, and explainability.
  • Certification and Accreditation: Creating a system for certifying AI systems compliant with GASI standards and accrediting organizations that conduct these certifications.
  • Governance and Compliance: Establishing mechanisms for:
    • Member state commitments to align national strategies with GASI standards.
    • Reporting and monitoring compliance (COBIT aligned).
    • Enforcement actions for non-compliance, including public censure, suspension, withdrawal of certification, and recommendations for national-level sanctions.
    • Mandating Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) for high-risk AI systems (GDPR).
  • Research and Development: Funding research on responsible AI, including AI safety, bias mitigation, and societal impact.
  • Stakeholder Engagement: Conducting public consultations and collaborating with industry and civil society.
  • Capacity Building: Developing training programs and educational resources on responsible AI.
  • International Cooperation: Working with other international organizations to promote harmonization of AI standards and regulations.

Aligning with Best Practices

GASI’s framework is strategically aligned with established standards and practices:

  • COBIT: Provides a framework for governance and management of AI, including control objectives, performance measurement, and risk management.
  • FAIR: Enables quantitative risk assessment for AI systems, facilitating informed risk management decisions.
  • GDPR: Ensures data protection and privacy are central to GASI’s standards, addressing data subject rights, DPIAs, and data breach notification.

Ensuring Accountability and Fairness

GASI incorporates robust mechanisms for accountability and fairness:

  • Compliance Checks and Audits: Regular audits, self-assessments, and third-party audits to assess compliance. Transparency of audit results.
  • Handling Deviations: Clear process for reporting, investigating, and remediating deviations from GASI standards.
  • Penalties and Sanctions: Graded system of penalties for non-compliance, including public censure, suspension, withdrawal of certification, and recommendations for national-level sanctions. Due process for appeals.
  • Ombudsman: Independent ombudsman to investigate complaints related to GASI’s operations, ensuring impartiality and responsiveness.

Implementation Roadmap

A phased approach to GASI’s implementation is recommended:

  • Phase 1: Establish the core governance structure, define initial ethical principles, and develop key technical standards.
  • Phase 2: Pilot certification and accreditation programs, conduct initial audits, and establish enforcement mechanisms.
  • Phase 3: Expand the scope of standards and certification, strengthen international cooperation, and enhance capacity building efforts.

Conclusion

GASI represents a crucial step towards ensuring the responsible development and deployment of AI globally. By fostering collaboration, setting clear standards, and promoting accountability, GASI can help unlock the immense potential of AI while mitigating its risks.

More Insights

US Rejects UN’s Call for Global AI Governance Framework

U.S. officials rejected the establishment of a global AI governance framework at the United Nations General Assembly, despite broad support from many nations, including China. Michael Kratsios of the...

Agentic AI: Managing the Risks of Autonomous Systems

As companies increasingly adopt agentic AI systems for autonomous decision-making, they face the emerging challenge of agentic AI sprawl, which can lead to security vulnerabilities and operational...

AI as a New Opinion Gatekeeper: Addressing Hidden Biases

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into sectors like healthcare and finance, a new study highlights the potential for subtle biases in AI systems to distort public...

AI Accountability: A New Era of Regulation and Compliance

The burgeoning world of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is at a critical juncture as regulatory actions signal a new era of accountability and ethical deployment. Recent events highlight the shift...

Choosing Effective AI Governance Tools for Safer Adoption

As generative AI continues to evolve, so do the associated risks, making AI governance tools essential for managing these challenges. This initiative, in collaboration with Tokio Marine Group, aims to...

UN Initiatives for Trustworthy AI Governance

The United Nations is working to influence global policy on artificial intelligence by establishing an expert panel to develop standards for "safe, secure and trustworthy" AI. This initiative aims to...

Data-Driven Governance: Shaping AI Regulation in Singapore

The conversation between Thomas Roehm from SAS and Frankie Phua from United Overseas Bank at the SAS Innovate On Tour in Singapore explores how data-driven regulation can effectively govern rapidly...

Preparing SMEs for EU AI Compliance Challenges

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) must navigate the complexities of the EU AI Act, which categorizes many AI applications as "high-risk" and imposes strict compliance requirements. To adapt...

Draft Guidance on Reporting Serious Incidents Under the EU AI Act

On September 26, 2025, the European Commission published draft guidance on serious incident reporting requirements for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act. Organizations developing or deploying...