Wisconsin Lawmakers Propose Legislation to Classify AI as Non-Human
MADISON, Wis. – In a significant move, Wisconsin lawmakers are advancing a bill aimed at explicitly classifying artificial intelligence (AI) as non-human, effectively banning marriages between humans and AI systems. This legislative proposal seeks to clarify the status of AI in the legal framework, emphasizing that technology must serve humanity, rather than replace it.
Key Provisions of the Bill
- Prohibition of marriages between humans and AI systems.
- Prevention of AI from owning property or managing corporations.
- Exemption of AI from legal liability in court.
- Ban on marriages between AI systems themselves.
Legislative Support and Concerns
State Rep. Lindee Brill, a Republican from Sheboygan Falls and the bill’s author, articulated the underlying philosophy of the legislation. “Technology must serve humanity, not replace it,” she stated, underscoring the need for a regulatory framework that prioritizes human interests.
During a public hearing on the bill, state Rep. Darrin Madison, a Democrat from Milwaukee, raised concerns about the adequacy of self-regulation by tech companies. He remarked, “Placing full trust in companies to self-regulate when they have billions of dollars to defend themselves is a fallacious path forward.” This sentiment reflects a growing apprehension regarding the unchecked growth of AI technologies.
Future of AI Regulation
State Rep. Alex Joers, the vice-chair of the Task Force on Protecting Kids from the bill’s origin, noted that multiple states are contemplating similar measures. He emphasized the necessity of taking “measured steps” to regulate emerging technologies. Joers acknowledged the fast-paced nature of the Task Force’s work, suggesting that further discussions will be necessary to refine AI regulation.
In conclusion, as the debate surrounding AI regulation intensifies, Wisconsin’s legislative efforts may serve as a blueprint for other states grappling with similar issues. The proposed bill not only seeks to establish clear boundaries for AI but also raises essential questions about the role of technology in society.
