Virginia’s Bold Step in Regulating High-Risk AI Systems

Charting the Future of AI Regulation

Virginia is on the brink of becoming the second state in the U.S. to enact comprehensive legislation governing the use of high-risk artificial intelligence (AI) systems, following in the footsteps of Colorado. This legislation is a crucial step towards addressing the growing concerns surrounding algorithmic discrimination.

Legislative Overview

On February 12, 2025, the Virginia state senate passed the High-Risk Artificial Intelligence Developer and Deployer Act (H.B. 2094), which aims to regulate AI applications across various sectors, particularly those impacting employment decisions. If signed into law by Governor Glenn Youngkin, this act will take effect on July 1, 2026, and introduce new compliance requirements for businesses utilizing high-risk AI systems.

Key Provisions of H.B. 2094

The act defines high-risk AI systems as those that either autonomously make or significantly influence consequential decisions, such as those relating to employment, lending, housing, and education. One of the key distinctions in Virginia’s approach is the requirement that AI must be the principal basis for a decision to trigger anti-discrimination measures.

Consumer Protection Goals

A primary objective of this legislation is to protect consumers from algorithmic discrimination. The act defines a consumer as a natural person residing in Virginia who acts in an individual or household context. Notably, the definition excludes individuals acting in a commercial or employment capacity, raising questions about how job applicants are categorized under the law.

Obligations for Developers and Deployers

Both developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems are mandated to exercise a reasonable duty of care to mitigate potential discriminatory harms. Developers must disclose critical information about the AI systems they create, including intended uses, known limitations, and measures taken to address algorithmic bias.

Deployers, on the other hand, are required to establish a risk management policy tailored to the specific high-risk AI systems they implement. They must also conduct an impact assessment prior to deploying such systems, considering factors like the system’s purpose and potential discriminatory risks.

Exemptions and Safe Harbors

While H.B. 2094 has broad applicability, it provides exemptions for certain entities that are already subject to more stringent regulations, such as federal agencies and regulated financial institutions. Additionally, there are provisions that protect businesses from disclosing trade secrets and provide a safe harbor for those who comply with the specified operating standards.

Enforcement Mechanisms

The enforcement of this legislation falls solely under the jurisdiction of the attorney general, who can impose civil penalties for violations. Non-willful violations may incur fines of up to $1,000, while willful violations can result in fines reaching $10,000 per instance.

Future Implications

As the law is anticipated to take effect in 2026, organizations developing or deploying high-risk AI systems are encouraged to begin preparing for compliance now. Aligning with established frameworks like the NIST AI Risk Management Framework can help mitigate legal risks and enhance transparency.

Conclusion

Virginia’s High-Risk Artificial Intelligence Developer and Deployer Act marks a significant advancement in AI governance at the state level, emphasizing the need for responsible AI practices. By implementing clear documentation and consumer disclosures, the legislation aims to foster trust and safeguard against algorithmic discrimination.

More Insights

US Rejects UN’s Call for Global AI Governance Framework

U.S. officials rejected the establishment of a global AI governance framework at the United Nations General Assembly, despite broad support from many nations, including China. Michael Kratsios of the...

Agentic AI: Managing the Risks of Autonomous Systems

As companies increasingly adopt agentic AI systems for autonomous decision-making, they face the emerging challenge of agentic AI sprawl, which can lead to security vulnerabilities and operational...

AI as a New Opinion Gatekeeper: Addressing Hidden Biases

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into sectors like healthcare and finance, a new study highlights the potential for subtle biases in AI systems to distort public...

AI Accountability: A New Era of Regulation and Compliance

The burgeoning world of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is at a critical juncture as regulatory actions signal a new era of accountability and ethical deployment. Recent events highlight the shift...

Choosing Effective AI Governance Tools for Safer Adoption

As generative AI continues to evolve, so do the associated risks, making AI governance tools essential for managing these challenges. This initiative, in collaboration with Tokio Marine Group, aims to...

UN Initiatives for Trustworthy AI Governance

The United Nations is working to influence global policy on artificial intelligence by establishing an expert panel to develop standards for "safe, secure and trustworthy" AI. This initiative aims to...

Data-Driven Governance: Shaping AI Regulation in Singapore

The conversation between Thomas Roehm from SAS and Frankie Phua from United Overseas Bank at the SAS Innovate On Tour in Singapore explores how data-driven regulation can effectively govern rapidly...

Preparing SMEs for EU AI Compliance Challenges

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) must navigate the complexities of the EU AI Act, which categorizes many AI applications as "high-risk" and imposes strict compliance requirements. To adapt...

Draft Guidance on Reporting Serious Incidents Under the EU AI Act

On September 26, 2025, the European Commission published draft guidance on serious incident reporting requirements for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act. Organizations developing or deploying...