Virginia’s Bold Step in Regulating High-Risk AI Systems

Charting the Future of AI Regulation

Virginia is on the brink of becoming the second state in the U.S. to enact comprehensive legislation governing the use of high-risk artificial intelligence (AI) systems, following in the footsteps of Colorado. This legislation is a crucial step towards addressing the growing concerns surrounding algorithmic discrimination.

Legislative Overview

On February 12, 2025, the Virginia state senate passed the High-Risk Artificial Intelligence Developer and Deployer Act (H.B. 2094), which aims to regulate AI applications across various sectors, particularly those impacting employment decisions. If signed into law by Governor Glenn Youngkin, this act will take effect on July 1, 2026, and introduce new compliance requirements for businesses utilizing high-risk AI systems.

Key Provisions of H.B. 2094

The act defines high-risk AI systems as those that either autonomously make or significantly influence consequential decisions, such as those relating to employment, lending, housing, and education. One of the key distinctions in Virginia’s approach is the requirement that AI must be the principal basis for a decision to trigger anti-discrimination measures.

Consumer Protection Goals

A primary objective of this legislation is to protect consumers from algorithmic discrimination. The act defines a consumer as a natural person residing in Virginia who acts in an individual or household context. Notably, the definition excludes individuals acting in a commercial or employment capacity, raising questions about how job applicants are categorized under the law.

Obligations for Developers and Deployers

Both developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems are mandated to exercise a reasonable duty of care to mitigate potential discriminatory harms. Developers must disclose critical information about the AI systems they create, including intended uses, known limitations, and measures taken to address algorithmic bias.

Deployers, on the other hand, are required to establish a risk management policy tailored to the specific high-risk AI systems they implement. They must also conduct an impact assessment prior to deploying such systems, considering factors like the system’s purpose and potential discriminatory risks.

Exemptions and Safe Harbors

While H.B. 2094 has broad applicability, it provides exemptions for certain entities that are already subject to more stringent regulations, such as federal agencies and regulated financial institutions. Additionally, there are provisions that protect businesses from disclosing trade secrets and provide a safe harbor for those who comply with the specified operating standards.

Enforcement Mechanisms

The enforcement of this legislation falls solely under the jurisdiction of the attorney general, who can impose civil penalties for violations. Non-willful violations may incur fines of up to $1,000, while willful violations can result in fines reaching $10,000 per instance.

Future Implications

As the law is anticipated to take effect in 2026, organizations developing or deploying high-risk AI systems are encouraged to begin preparing for compliance now. Aligning with established frameworks like the NIST AI Risk Management Framework can help mitigate legal risks and enhance transparency.

Conclusion

Virginia’s High-Risk Artificial Intelligence Developer and Deployer Act marks a significant advancement in AI governance at the state level, emphasizing the need for responsible AI practices. By implementing clear documentation and consumer disclosures, the legislation aims to foster trust and safeguard against algorithmic discrimination.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...