Virginia’s Bold Step in Regulating High-Risk AI Systems

Charting the Future of AI Regulation

Virginia is on the brink of becoming the second state in the U.S. to enact comprehensive legislation governing the use of high-risk artificial intelligence (AI) systems, following in the footsteps of Colorado. This legislation is a crucial step towards addressing the growing concerns surrounding algorithmic discrimination.

Legislative Overview

On February 12, 2025, the Virginia state senate passed the High-Risk Artificial Intelligence Developer and Deployer Act (H.B. 2094), which aims to regulate AI applications across various sectors, particularly those impacting employment decisions. If signed into law by Governor Glenn Youngkin, this act will take effect on July 1, 2026, and introduce new compliance requirements for businesses utilizing high-risk AI systems.

Key Provisions of H.B. 2094

The act defines high-risk AI systems as those that either autonomously make or significantly influence consequential decisions, such as those relating to employment, lending, housing, and education. One of the key distinctions in Virginia’s approach is the requirement that AI must be the principal basis for a decision to trigger anti-discrimination measures.

Consumer Protection Goals

A primary objective of this legislation is to protect consumers from algorithmic discrimination. The act defines a consumer as a natural person residing in Virginia who acts in an individual or household context. Notably, the definition excludes individuals acting in a commercial or employment capacity, raising questions about how job applicants are categorized under the law.

Obligations for Developers and Deployers

Both developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems are mandated to exercise a reasonable duty of care to mitigate potential discriminatory harms. Developers must disclose critical information about the AI systems they create, including intended uses, known limitations, and measures taken to address algorithmic bias.

Deployers, on the other hand, are required to establish a risk management policy tailored to the specific high-risk AI systems they implement. They must also conduct an impact assessment prior to deploying such systems, considering factors like the system’s purpose and potential discriminatory risks.

Exemptions and Safe Harbors

While H.B. 2094 has broad applicability, it provides exemptions for certain entities that are already subject to more stringent regulations, such as federal agencies and regulated financial institutions. Additionally, there are provisions that protect businesses from disclosing trade secrets and provide a safe harbor for those who comply with the specified operating standards.

Enforcement Mechanisms

The enforcement of this legislation falls solely under the jurisdiction of the attorney general, who can impose civil penalties for violations. Non-willful violations may incur fines of up to $1,000, while willful violations can result in fines reaching $10,000 per instance.

Future Implications

As the law is anticipated to take effect in 2026, organizations developing or deploying high-risk AI systems are encouraged to begin preparing for compliance now. Aligning with established frameworks like the NIST AI Risk Management Framework can help mitigate legal risks and enhance transparency.

Conclusion

Virginia’s High-Risk Artificial Intelligence Developer and Deployer Act marks a significant advancement in AI governance at the state level, emphasizing the need for responsible AI practices. By implementing clear documentation and consumer disclosures, the legislation aims to foster trust and safeguard against algorithmic discrimination.

More Insights

CII Advocates for Strong AI Accountability in Financial Services

The Chartered Insurance Institute (CII) has urged for clear accountability frameworks and a skills strategy for the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in financial services. They emphasize the...

Regulating AI in APAC MedTech: Current Trends and Future Directions

The regulatory landscape for AI-enabled MedTech in the Asia Pacific region is still developing, with existing frameworks primarily governing other technologies. While countries like China, Japan, and...

New York’s AI Legislation: Key Changes Employers Must Know

In early 2025, New York proposed the NY AI Act and the AI Consumer Protection Act to regulate the use of artificial intelligence, particularly addressing algorithmic discrimination in employment...

Managing AI Risks: Effective Frameworks for Safe Implementation

This article discusses the importance of AI risk management frameworks to mitigate potential risks associated with artificial intelligence systems. It highlights various types of risks, including...

Essential Insights on the EU Artificial Intelligence Act for Tech Companies

The European Union has introduced the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), which aims to manage the risks and opportunities associated with AI technologies across Europe. This landmark regulation...

South Korea’s Landmark AI Basic Act: A New Era of Regulation

South Korea has established itself as a leader in AI regulation in Asia with the introduction of the AI Basic Act, which creates a comprehensive legal framework for artificial intelligence. This...

EU AI Act and DORA: Mastering Compliance in Financial Services

The EU AI Act and DORA are reshaping how financial entities manage AI risk by introducing new layers of compliance that demand transparency, accountability, and quantifiable risk assessments...

AI Governance: Bridging the Transatlantic Divide

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping economies, societies, and global governance, presenting both significant opportunities and risks. This chapter examines the divergent approaches of...

EU’s Ambitious Plan to Boost AI Development

The EU Commission is launching a new strategy to reduce barriers for the deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) across Europe, aiming to enhance the region's competitiveness on a global scale. The...