Updated AI Resource Hub for Credit Unions: Enhancing Governance and Risk Management

NCUA Issues Updated AI Resource Hub

On December 22, the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) updated its Artificial Intelligence (AI) resource page to consolidate key technical and policy references for federally insured credit unions. This page is part of NCUA’s broader cybersecurity and financial technology resources and is explicitly framed as support for evaluating and performing due diligence on third-party AI vendors.

The updated page links AI oversight back to existing NCUA guidance on third-party relationships, including 07-CU-13 (Evaluating Third Party Relationships) and 01-CU-20 (Due Diligence Over Third Party Service Providers).

AI Usage in Credit Unions

NCUA notes that credit unions are increasingly using AI to enhance member service, streamline operations, and maintain competitiveness while also facing AI-specific risks. These risks include:

  • Algorithmic opacity
  • Fair lending concerns
  • Data privacy and security
  • Operational resilience
  • Model risk

The resources on the page are presented as tools to help address these issues rather than as new regulatory requirements.

AI Governance and Risk Management

For AI governance, NCUA directs credit unions to the U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) AI resources. NIST’s materials provide a structured approach to AI design, development, governance, and use, including practical recommendations for managing risks to individuals and organizations.

NCUA highlights that these resources may assist credit unions in developing “trustworthy” AI systems that align with their cooperative, member-focused mission. Additionally, NCUA references a Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission paper titled “Realize the Full Potential of Artificial Intelligence,” which applies the COSO enterprise risk management framework to AI.

AI Data Security and Secure Deployment

The NCUA resource page points to two AI-focused publications from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). The first publication is a Cybersecurity Information Sheet on AI Data Security, which discusses securing the data that powers AI systems across their lifecycle, including:

  • Data supply chain security
  • Protection against maliciously modified data
  • Managing data drift to preserve the integrity and accuracy of AI-driven decisions

NCUA notes that these materials may assist credit unions in building data security frameworks for AI training and operational data.

The second CISA document, “Deploying AI Systems Securely,” addresses methods for securely deploying and operating AI systems developed by external entities. It covers issues such as:

  • Protecting model weights
  • Implementing secure APIs
  • Establishing continuous monitoring protocols for AI systems in production

AI in Financial Services and Deepfake-Driven Fraud

To place AI in a financial sector context, NCUA references a U.S. Department of the Treasury report, “Artificial Intelligence in Financial Services.” This report examines traditional AI and generative AI use cases, addressing data privacy and security standards, bias and explainability challenges, consumer protection issues, concentration risk, and third-party vendor management related to AI technologies.

NCUA suggests that credit unions can use this report to better understand the regulatory landscape and risk mitigation expectations as they evaluate AI tools. Furthermore, NCUA highlights a FinCEN report on “Fraud Schemes Involving Deepfake Media Targeting Financial Institutions,” which describes how criminals use AI-generated deepfakes to create fake identity documents, photos, and videos.

This publication outlines specific red-flag indicators of such activity and offers best practices for strengthening identity verification and reporting suspicious activity. NCUA notes that credit unions can use this material to enhance fraud detection capabilities and member protection against AI-enabled scams.

Conclusion

In summary, NCUA’s updated AI resource hub signals that supervisory expectations around AI will be grounded in existing, well-known frameworks rather than in a bespoke AI rulebook or through regulation by enforcement action. The update confirms that AI is firmly within the scope of third-party oversight and traditional safety-and-soundness, compliance, and cybersecurity disciplines. Credit unions exploring or expanding AI use can expect NCUA examiners to use these same sources as benchmarks when assessing how credit unions are governing AI solutions and managing associated risks.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...