Understanding the European AI Act: Key Requirements for Employers

Understanding the European AI Act: Implications for Employers

The European AI Act introduces a uniform legal framework for the use of artificial intelligence (AI) within companies across Europe. As AI continues to evolve rapidly and permeate various aspects of business operations, compliance with this act has become critical.

Key Dates and Compliance Requirements

Effective from February 2, 2025, all employers in Europe must adhere to the stipulations of the AI Act. Non-compliance can result in significant fines. While businesses in the UK are not required to follow the act domestically, those that operate in Europe or engage with the EU market must comply by the aforementioned date.

Essential Components of the AI Act

According to legal experts, the AI Act mandates two primary requirements for employers:

  • AI Policy: Employers must develop an AI policy that outlines measures to ensure employees are adequately informed about AI, its potentials, and its pitfalls.
  • Prohibition of Certain AI Systems: Any AI systems deemed forbidden by the act must be eliminated within EU organizations.

Broad Applicability

The regulations apply to all organizations utilizing AI, regardless of size. This encompasses any entity with employees—whether directly on payroll or engaged through other means—using AI for organizational purposes. Enforcement of these regulations will be managed by individual member states, with fines imposed on non-compliant organizations.

Implications for UK Businesses

Even companies outside the EU should remain vigilant. The trend of post-Brexit regulatory alignment suggests that the UK may develop domestic legislation mirroring the AI Act, particularly with a Labour party inclined towards closer ties with Europe.

Ensuring AI Literacy

Employers must guarantee that their workforce possesses sufficient AI literacy. This requirement does not necessitate exhaustive knowledge of AI among all employees but rather ensures that individuals involved with AI systems are equipped to make informed decisions and recognize potential risks.

To achieve this, employers should consider:

  • The technical knowledge and experience of their staff.
  • The specific context in which AI systems will be deployed.
  • The diverse roles of individuals interacting with AI technologies.

Employers have the discretion to determine the necessary knowledge and skills for their employees and the methods for acquiring them. Options may include:

  • General training on AI fundamentals.
  • Specialized training focused on specific tools and applications.
  • Collaboration between legal and technical teams to develop comprehensive guidelines.

Creating a Robust AI Policy

Employers are advised to draft a detailed AI policy with clear guidelines for AI usage within their organizations. Such a policy should cover:

  • Permissible applications and their designated users.
  • Procedures for maintaining AI literacy as tools and positions evolve.

Identifying Prohibited AI Systems

Starting February 2, 2025, employers must also identify and cease the use of AI systems that contravene fundamental European norms and values. Examples of prohibited systems include:

  • AI systems for social scoring, which evaluate individuals based on their social behaviors or personal characteristics.
  • Emotion recognition AI systems used in workplaces or educational settings.

Consequences of Non-Compliance

From August 2, 2025, organizations that develop or deploy prohibited AI systems risk facing substantial fines, which could reach up to EUR 35 million or up to 7% of the total global annual revenue from the previous fiscal year, whichever amount is greater.

In conclusion, the European AI Act represents a significant turning point for employers across Europe, necessitating immediate action to ensure compliance and safeguard against potential penalties. The evolving landscape of AI regulation underscores the importance of proactive measures in fostering a culture of AI literacy and ethical use within organizations.

More Insights

US Rejects UN’s Call for Global AI Governance Framework

U.S. officials rejected the establishment of a global AI governance framework at the United Nations General Assembly, despite broad support from many nations, including China. Michael Kratsios of the...

Agentic AI: Managing the Risks of Autonomous Systems

As companies increasingly adopt agentic AI systems for autonomous decision-making, they face the emerging challenge of agentic AI sprawl, which can lead to security vulnerabilities and operational...

AI as a New Opinion Gatekeeper: Addressing Hidden Biases

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into sectors like healthcare and finance, a new study highlights the potential for subtle biases in AI systems to distort public...

AI Accountability: A New Era of Regulation and Compliance

The burgeoning world of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is at a critical juncture as regulatory actions signal a new era of accountability and ethical deployment. Recent events highlight the shift...

Choosing Effective AI Governance Tools for Safer Adoption

As generative AI continues to evolve, so do the associated risks, making AI governance tools essential for managing these challenges. This initiative, in collaboration with Tokio Marine Group, aims to...

UN Initiatives for Trustworthy AI Governance

The United Nations is working to influence global policy on artificial intelligence by establishing an expert panel to develop standards for "safe, secure and trustworthy" AI. This initiative aims to...

Data-Driven Governance: Shaping AI Regulation in Singapore

The conversation between Thomas Roehm from SAS and Frankie Phua from United Overseas Bank at the SAS Innovate On Tour in Singapore explores how data-driven regulation can effectively govern rapidly...

Preparing SMEs for EU AI Compliance Challenges

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) must navigate the complexities of the EU AI Act, which categorizes many AI applications as "high-risk" and imposes strict compliance requirements. To adapt...

Draft Guidance on Reporting Serious Incidents Under the EU AI Act

On September 26, 2025, the European Commission published draft guidance on serious incident reporting requirements for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act. Organizations developing or deploying...