Global AI Regulation: Trends and Challenges

AI Watch: Global Regulatory Tracker – Israel

The landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly evolving, and nations across the globe are striving to establish regulatory frameworks that can keep pace with this technological advancement. Israel, known for its robust tech ecosystem, has introduced policies aimed at promoting responsible AI innovation while addressing ethical concerns.

Current Regulatory Framework

As of now, Israel lacks specific codified laws that directly regulate AI. However, the Israeli Ministry of Innovation, Science and Technology (MIST), in collaboration with the Ministry of Justice (MOJ), has put forth significant policy documents:

  • A White Paper on AI published in 2022.
  • The first policy on “Artificial Intelligence Regulations and Ethics” released in 2023.

The AI Policy encourages a principle-based, sector-specific regulatory approach utilizing soft tools like non-binding ethical principles and voluntary standards. This flexible regulatory approach allows for adjustments as technology evolves, though it also introduces challenges regarding compliance and accountability.

Key Developments in AI Policy

Israel’s AI Policy is part of a broader initiative to address both the opportunities and risks associated with AI. Noteworthy developments include:

  • Government Decision No. 212: A decision focusing on reinforcing Israel’s technological leadership, tasked MIST with advancing a national AI plan.
  • Proposed formation of a national-level forum for public participation in AI policy, aiming to enhance coordination among regulators and stakeholders.
  • Draft guidelines from the Israeli Privacy Protection Authority on applying privacy laws to AI systems, emphasizing transparency and data protection.

Core Challenges Identified

The AI Policy highlights several core challenges that need to be addressed:

  • Discrimination: Risks stemming from biases in training data that could lead to discriminatory outcomes.
  • Human Oversight: Lack of human oversight in AI decision-making raises accountability concerns.
  • Explainability: Difficulty in explaining AI operations due to the ‘black box’ effect can result in arbitrary decisions.
  • Transparency: Ensuring individuals are aware of AI interactions to prevent misinformation.
  • Accountability: Establishing frameworks for liability in cases of harm caused by AI systems.
  • Privacy: Safeguarding personal data in AI applications must comply with existing privacy laws.

International Collaboration

Israel actively participates in international forums to shape AI standards, including:

  • The OECD’s Working Party on AI Governance
  • The Council of Europe’s Committee on AI

On September 5, 2024, Israel became a signatory to the Council of Europe’s Framework Convention on AI, which aims to establish a global standard for AI governance. This treaty signifies a commitment to collaborative international efforts in regulating AI technologies.

Conclusion

As AI continues to evolve, Israel’s regulatory landscape will likely adapt to ensure that innovation is balanced with ethical considerations. The emphasis on a flexible regulatory framework aims to foster growth while addressing the complexities of AI technologies. Businesses operating within this space are encouraged to remain vigilant and proactive in understanding the implications of these regulations as they develop.

More Insights

The Perils of ‘Good Enough’ AI in Compliance

In today's fast-paced world, the allure of 'good enough' AI in compliance can lead to significant legal risks when speed compromises accuracy. Leaders must ensure that AI tools provide explainable...

European Commission Unveils AI Code of Practice for General-Purpose Models

On July 10, 2025, the European Commission published the final version of the General-Purpose AI Code of Practice, which aims to provide a framework for compliance with certain provisions of the EU AI...

EU Introduces New Code to Streamline AI Compliance

The European Union has introduced a voluntary code of practice to assist companies in complying with the upcoming AI Act, which will regulate AI usage across its member states. This code addresses...

Reforming AI Procurement for Government Accountability

This article discusses the importance of procurement processes in the adoption of AI technologies by local governments, highlighting how loopholes can lead to a lack of oversight. It emphasizes the...

Pillar Security Launches Comprehensive AI Security Framework

Pillar Security has developed an AI security framework called the Secure AI Lifecycle Framework (SAIL), aimed at enhancing the industry's approach to AI security through strategy and governance. The...

Tokio Marine Unveils Comprehensive AI Governance Framework

Tokio Marine Holdings has established a formal AI governance framework to guide its global operations in developing and using artificial intelligence. The policy emphasizes transparency, human...

Shadow AI: The Urgent Need for Governance Solutions

Generative AI (GenAI) is rapidly becoming integral to business operations, often without proper oversight or approval, leading to what is termed as Shadow AI. Companies must establish clear governance...

Fragmented Futures: The Battle for AI Regulation

The article discusses the complexities of regulating artificial intelligence (AI) as various countries adopt different approaches to governance, resulting in a fragmented landscape. It explores how...

Fragmented Futures: The Battle for AI Regulation

The article discusses the complexities of regulating artificial intelligence (AI) as various countries adopt different approaches to governance, resulting in a fragmented landscape. It explores how...