Texas Enacts Groundbreaking AI Governance Law

Texas Takes a Shot at AI Regulation With ‘Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act’

On June 22, 2025, Texas became the latest state to enact comprehensive AI legislation, introducing the Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act. This law, effective January 1, 2026, positions Texas as the second state, following Colorado, to implement comprehensive AI regulations. The act aims to balance corporate desires for AI innovation with consumer protection, anti-discrimination, and ethical considerations.

Quick Hits

  • The Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act establishes a broad framework for the acceptable development, deployment, and oversight of AI systems in Texas.
  • The act identifies certain acceptable and unacceptable uses of AI systems, creates the Texas Artificial Intelligence Council to oversee AI governance, and introduces a regulatory sandbox program for testing AI innovations.
  • Enforcement authority is vested exclusively in the Texas Office of the Attorney General, with significant civil penalties for violations and structured opportunities to cure noncompliance.

Overview

The Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act marks a significant move by Texas to lead in AI regulation at the state level. The act applies to any person or entity conducting business in Texas, producing products or services used by Texas residents, or developing or deploying AI systems within the state. Notably, certain governmental and healthcare entities are exempted.

The act defines an “artificial intelligence system” as any machine-based system that infers from inputs to generate outputs—such as content, decisions, predictions, or recommendations—that can influence physical or virtual environments. This definition encompasses systems involving machine learning, natural language processing, perception, speech, and content generation.

Unlike some other state AI laws that broadly address risks associated with AI, the Texas law focuses on a narrow, explicitly delineated set of harmful uses, particularly those involving biometric information.

Prohibited Practices

The legislation outlines several prohibited AI practices that businesses operating in Texas must avoid. These include:

  • Manipulating human behavior, particularly to incite self-harm, harm to others, or criminal activity.
  • Infringing upon constitutional rights or unlawfully discriminating against protected classes, such as race, color, national origin, sex, age, religion, or disability.
  • Creating illegal content, including AI-generated child sexual abuse material or deepfake content in violation of the Texas Penal Code.

Furthermore, governmental entities are prohibited from using AI tools to uniquely identify individuals through biometric data or capture images without consent if it infringes on constitutional rights or violates other laws. Healthcare providers must also provide clear disclosures when patients interact with AI systems in their care or treatment.

Promoting Innovation: The Texas Artificial Intelligence Council and the Regulatory Sandbox Program

The act establishes the Texas Artificial Intelligence Council, a seven-member body with varied expertise appointed by state leadership. The Council’s mandate includes:

  • Identifying legislative improvements and providing guidance on the use of AI systems.
  • Evaluating laws that hinder AI system innovation and proposing reforms.
  • Assessing potential regulatory capture risks, such as undue influence by technology companies.

Additionally, the act introduces a regulatory sandbox, allowing approved participants to test AI systems for up to thirty-six months. This framework fosters innovation while maintaining oversight, although participants must submit detailed applications and quarterly performance reports.

Enforcement and Penalties

The act does not provide a private right of action; however, enforcement authority lies with the Texas Office of the Attorney General. The penalties for violations range significantly, including:

  • $10,000 to $12,000 per curable violation.
  • $80,000 to $200,000 per uncurable violation.
  • $2,000 to $40,000 per day for continuing violations.

A sixty-day cure period is provided before enforcement action is taken, and compliance with recognized AI risk management frameworks may establish a rebuttable presumption of reasonable care.

Looking Forward

The Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act positions Texas as a leader in state-level AI regulation. It represents a new approach to AI governance in the U.S., aiming to balance technological progress with consumer protections and common-sense restrictions. While its effectiveness remains to be seen, businesses operating in Texas should remain aware of the new law and consider revisions to their practices to align with its requirements.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...