Texas Enacts Groundbreaking AI Governance Law

Texas Takes a Shot at AI Regulation With ‘Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act’

On June 22, 2025, Texas became the latest state to enact comprehensive AI legislation, introducing the Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act. This law, effective January 1, 2026, positions Texas as the second state, following Colorado, to implement comprehensive AI regulations. The act aims to balance corporate desires for AI innovation with consumer protection, anti-discrimination, and ethical considerations.

Quick Hits

  • The Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act establishes a broad framework for the acceptable development, deployment, and oversight of AI systems in Texas.
  • The act identifies certain acceptable and unacceptable uses of AI systems, creates the Texas Artificial Intelligence Council to oversee AI governance, and introduces a regulatory sandbox program for testing AI innovations.
  • Enforcement authority is vested exclusively in the Texas Office of the Attorney General, with significant civil penalties for violations and structured opportunities to cure noncompliance.

Overview

The Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act marks a significant move by Texas to lead in AI regulation at the state level. The act applies to any person or entity conducting business in Texas, producing products or services used by Texas residents, or developing or deploying AI systems within the state. Notably, certain governmental and healthcare entities are exempted.

The act defines an “artificial intelligence system” as any machine-based system that infers from inputs to generate outputs—such as content, decisions, predictions, or recommendations—that can influence physical or virtual environments. This definition encompasses systems involving machine learning, natural language processing, perception, speech, and content generation.

Unlike some other state AI laws that broadly address risks associated with AI, the Texas law focuses on a narrow, explicitly delineated set of harmful uses, particularly those involving biometric information.

Prohibited Practices

The legislation outlines several prohibited AI practices that businesses operating in Texas must avoid. These include:

  • Manipulating human behavior, particularly to incite self-harm, harm to others, or criminal activity.
  • Infringing upon constitutional rights or unlawfully discriminating against protected classes, such as race, color, national origin, sex, age, religion, or disability.
  • Creating illegal content, including AI-generated child sexual abuse material or deepfake content in violation of the Texas Penal Code.

Furthermore, governmental entities are prohibited from using AI tools to uniquely identify individuals through biometric data or capture images without consent if it infringes on constitutional rights or violates other laws. Healthcare providers must also provide clear disclosures when patients interact with AI systems in their care or treatment.

Promoting Innovation: The Texas Artificial Intelligence Council and the Regulatory Sandbox Program

The act establishes the Texas Artificial Intelligence Council, a seven-member body with varied expertise appointed by state leadership. The Council’s mandate includes:

  • Identifying legislative improvements and providing guidance on the use of AI systems.
  • Evaluating laws that hinder AI system innovation and proposing reforms.
  • Assessing potential regulatory capture risks, such as undue influence by technology companies.

Additionally, the act introduces a regulatory sandbox, allowing approved participants to test AI systems for up to thirty-six months. This framework fosters innovation while maintaining oversight, although participants must submit detailed applications and quarterly performance reports.

Enforcement and Penalties

The act does not provide a private right of action; however, enforcement authority lies with the Texas Office of the Attorney General. The penalties for violations range significantly, including:

  • $10,000 to $12,000 per curable violation.
  • $80,000 to $200,000 per uncurable violation.
  • $2,000 to $40,000 per day for continuing violations.

A sixty-day cure period is provided before enforcement action is taken, and compliance with recognized AI risk management frameworks may establish a rebuttable presumption of reasonable care.

Looking Forward

The Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act positions Texas as a leader in state-level AI regulation. It represents a new approach to AI governance in the U.S., aiming to balance technological progress with consumer protections and common-sense restrictions. While its effectiveness remains to be seen, businesses operating in Texas should remain aware of the new law and consider revisions to their practices to align with its requirements.

More Insights

New Code of Practice for AI Compliance Set for 2025

The European Commission announced that a code of practice to help companies comply with the EU's artificial intelligence rules may only be implemented by the end of 2025. This delay follows calls from...

AI Governance: The Key to Successful Enterprise Implementation

Artificial intelligence is at a critical juncture, with many enterprise AI initiatives failing to reach production and exposing organizations to significant risks. Effective AI governance is essential...

AI Code Compliance: Companies May Get a Grace Period

The commission is considering providing a grace period for companies that agree to comply with the new AI Code. This initiative aims to facilitate a smoother transition for businesses adapting to the...

Texas Enacts Groundbreaking AI Governance Law

On June 22, 2025, Texas enacted the Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act, making it the second state to implement comprehensive AI legislation. The act establishes a framework for the...

Texas Enacts Groundbreaking AI Governance Law

On June 22, 2025, Texas enacted the Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act, making it the second state to implement comprehensive AI legislation. The act establishes a framework for the...

Laws in Europe Combatting Deepfakes

Denmark has introduced a law that grants individuals copyright over their likenesses to combat deepfakes, making it illegal to share such content without consent. Other European countries are also...

A Strategic Approach to Ethical AI Implementation

The federal government aims to enhance productivity by implementing artificial intelligence (AI) across various sectors, but emphasizes the importance of thoughtful deployment to avoid wasting public...

Navigating AI Regulation: A New Era for Insurance Compliance

On July 1, 2025, the U.S. Senate voted to reject a proposed ten-year moratorium on state-level AI regulation, allowing individual states to legislate independently. This decision creates a fragmented...

Navigating AI Regulation: A New Era for Insurance Compliance

On July 1, 2025, the U.S. Senate voted to reject a proposed ten-year moratorium on state-level AI regulation, allowing individual states to legislate independently. This decision creates a fragmented...