State AI Regulations Set to Take Effect in 2026 Amid Federal Pushback

Several State AI Laws Set to Take Effect in 2026

As the federal government moves to eliminate state-level regulations on artificial intelligence (AI), states like Illinois, Texas, and Colorado are set to implement their own laws governing AI in the workforce starting in 2026.

Federal Government’s Directive

On December 11, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order titled “Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence.” This order mandates a review of state laws considered “inconsistent” with the federal government’s plans for a national policy framework.

Illinois AI Law

Effective January 1, 2026, Illinois will implement H.B. 3773, which amends the state’s human rights act. This legislation specifies that discrimination stemming from AI decisions in hiring, firing, discipline, tenure, and training is actionable. Key components of the law include:

  • Employers must notify workers when AI is involved in workplace decisions.
  • Companies are prohibited from using ZIP codes in AI evaluations of candidates.

Since these protections are part of Illinois’ human rights code, they come with a private right of action.

Texas AI Law

Texas introduces the Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act, which aims to balance public safety, individual rights, and privacy while promoting AI innovation. Key features include:

  • Establishment of a sandbox program for testing AI systems with reduced regulatory risks.
  • Creation of a state council to support innovation and oversee compliance.
  • Unlike Illinois, this law does not provide a private right of action.

Texas also asserts that a showing of disparate impact is insufficient to prove discriminatory intent.

Colorado AI Law

Colorado’s measure, S.B. 24-205, is particularly significant as it aims to protect consumers from algorithmic discrimination. Important aspects of this law include:

  • Companies using high-risk AI systems must take reasonable measures to avoid algorithmic discrimination.
  • Mandatory disclosures regarding the use of AI systems.
  • Businesses and government agencies are required to conduct impact assessments and notify workers about AI involvement in employment decisions.
  • Applicants or employees must have the opportunity to appeal AI decisions.

This law will take effect in June 2026 and, similar to Texas, does not allow for a private cause of action; enforcement is the responsibility of the state attorney general.

Conclusion

Despite the federal government’s attempts to streamline AI regulations, the state laws in Illinois, Texas, and Colorado remain valid and enforceable. Employers in these states should prioritize compliance with these new regulations as they approach 2026. As the landscape of AI law evolves, expert guidance will be crucial for navigating these complexities.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...