South Korea’s AI Basic Act: Key Changes and Impact Ahead of 2026 Implementation

South Korea’s Revised AI Basic Act to Take Effect January 22, 2026

South Korea’s amended Artificial Intelligence Basic Act will take effect on January 22, 2026, ushering in a new regulatory framework that combines industrial promotion with trust, safety, and accountability requirements across both public and private deployments.

Legislative Background

The National Assembly approved the revisions on December 30, establishing the Artificial Intelligence Development and Trust-Based Ecosystem Act as the country’s core AI statute. This law formalizes the Presidential Council on National Artificial Intelligence Strategy as Korea’s central coordinating authority for national AI policy, reflecting Seoul’s goal of becoming a top-three AI power globally.

Implementation Timeline and Grace Period

According to the Ministry of Science and ICT, the law will be implemented alongside an enforcement decree that has largely been finalized. Industry will receive a one-year grace period focused on guidance rather than penalties, allowing companies time to prepare compliance documentation, conduct risk assessments, and deploy internal controls.

Key Provisions of the Law

The law includes mandatory watermarking and disclosure requirements for AI-generated content, aimed at combating misinformation and non-consensual deepfakes. It also introduces enhanced oversight for “high-impact” AI systems — including those using massive compute resources or affecting public operations, rights, or critical services. Operators of such systems must establish risk management plans, monitor social impacts, and may be subject to data requests and on-site inspections by the Strategy Council.

Public Sector Adoption and Support

To accelerate public-sector adoption, civil servants receive limited liability shields for good-faith use of AI tools, while separate provisions expand research labs, innovation clusters, and digital accessibility subsidies for vulnerable populations.

Future Considerations

Legal analyses indicate that the law will require companies to prepare governance procedures and documentation in advance of 2027 enforcement, particularly for content provenance, age-appropriate protections, and external disclosures. While the core provisions survived the decree process with minimal change, officials signaled that further sector-specific rules may follow, including procurement guidance and standards for industrial innovation.

Seek Expert Guidance

If you’re concerned or have questions about how to navigate the global AI regulatory landscape, don’t hesitate to reach out to BABL AI. Their Audit Experts can offer valuable insight and ensure you’re informed and compliant.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...