Shaping AI Governance in Latin America: Challenges and Opportunities

AI Regulation and Parliamentary Participation: A Regional Debate in Panama

The recent meeting titled “Innovation and Regulation for Development: Building Consensus toward People-Centered Artificial Intelligence” in Panama City highlighted the growing discourse surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) regulation in Latin America and the Caribbean. Organized by ParlAmericas in collaboration with the Development Bank of Latin America and the Caribbean (CAF) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), this event brought together a diverse group of stakeholders, including parliamentarians, specialists, civil society representatives, and members of the private sector.

Regional AI Regulatory Landscape

Among the key speakers was Noel Alonso Murray from Fundación Directorio Legislativo, who provided a comparative overview of the advances, challenges, and opportunities related to AI regulation in the region. She noted that Latin America is currently experiencing a surge in legislative activity regarding AI, but the pace of progress varies significantly across countries due to differing political and institutional contexts.

Alonso Murray emphasized that the region faces the critical challenge of transitioning from mere political will and draft legislation to the effective implementation of regulations. She pointed out that significant barriers, such as inadequate digital infrastructure and persistent capacity gaps, hinder this implementation process.

Advances, Tensions, and Good Practices

The presentation reviewed various national approaches to AI regulation, spotlighting countries like El Salvador and Peru, which have established operational regulatory frameworks. In contrast, countries such as Brazil, Chile, Mexico, and Colombia are in advanced stages of legislative debate, many of which are adopting risk-based governance models.

Alonso Murray also identified recurring tensions in the region, such as resistance to early regulation from certain scientific and private sector actors, the effects of electoral cycles on legislative agendas, and delays in regulations concerning personal data protection. These factors complicate the development of comprehensive AI regulation.

To navigate these complexities, she highlighted several parliamentary good practices, including the formation of specialized committees, fostering formal multi-stakeholder dialogue, and adopting Open Parliament approaches. These practices are essential for enhancing transparency, citizen participation, and accountability in debates on AI.

Regional Dialogue and Next Steps

The panel discussion also featured insights from Senator Sonia Shirley Bernal Sánchez from Colombia, Emanuella Ribeiro Halfeld Maciel from Instituto Alana in Brazil, and Juan Carlos Reynardus, a public policy consultant at Panama Legal Group. The session was moderated by Representative Rodrigo Goñi from Uruguay.

The event concluded with a call to deepen regional cooperation, promote people-centered AI governance frameworks, and strengthen the institutional capacities of parliaments. This collaborative effort aims to accompany technological development while safeguarding fundamental rights.

The participation of Fundación Directorio Legislativo in this meeting reflects its ongoing commitment to monitoring the regional legislative agenda, advocating for Open Parliament principles, and conducting comparative analyses of public policies related to innovation, democracy, and the responsible use of new technologies.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...