Seton Hall Introduces Advisory Council to Shape Ethical AI Policy and Classroom Guidance
Earlier this month, Seton Hall announced the formation of the Artificial Intelligence Advisory Council (AIAC) to assist students and staff in adapting to the rise of AI technologies. This initiative aligns with the university’s strategic plan, Inspiring Great Minds to Greater Purpose, announced in September 2025, which aims to enhance student learning and well-being.
Purpose and Structure of the AIAC
The AIAC was established to ensure that as AI technologies evolve, Seton Hall University approaches them thoughtfully and ethically, in alignment with its Catholic mission and strategic plan. The Council is co-chaired by Mary Ellen Roberts, chair of the Faculty Senate, and Jamie Werbel, assistant provost for faculty affairs. It is sponsored by Erik Lillquist, interim provost and executive vice president, and Paul Fisher, chief information officer.
This advisory body maintains Seton Hall’s Catholic values while providing guidance to the university community. The AIAC’s mission is to advance innovation grounded in Catholic moral teaching, respect for human dignity, and institutional values. It aims to support students through ethical AI literacy training, resources, policies, and guidelines for classroom use.
Guidance and Recommendations
The AIAC guides SHU leadership in various areas, including AI governance, educational practices, ethical oversight, AI training, and strategic advising. The Council supports teaching, learning, research, and operational excellence while upholding academic integrity, equity, and transparency.
Students may notice the AIAC’s impact in their syllabi, with new AI clauses varying by professor. While the university currently lacks an official AI policy, it provides recommendations from the AIAC. The Council’s website offers sample statements for professors to include in their syllabi, which can range from a complete ban on AI usage to allowing it with disclosure.
AI-Integrated Assignments
Students might also encounter AI-integrated assignments that require them to use tools like ChatGPT and submit their queries and responses. However, this practice contradicts AIAC guidance, which recommends limiting AI usage. The AIAC provides fresh perspectives on class assignments and strategies to minimize the use of Generative AI, acknowledging that the appropriateness of AI varies across different disciplines.
Adapting to Technological Evolution
As AI technology continues to evolve, the AIAC adapts its recommendations and guidance accordingly. Students are encouraged to stay informed about the latest developments from the AIAC through their official website.