Protecting Transparency in AI: The Case Against Loopholes

Joint Open Letter on Rejecting the Proposal to Undermine Transparency in the AI Act

In a significant push for accountability within the realm of artificial intelligence, CDT Europe, along with 60 organizations, has signed an open letter initiated by Access Now and European Digital Rights (EDRi). This letter, directed towards the EU institutions, strongly urges the rejection of the proposed deletion of the AI Act’s Article 49(2), which serves as a crucial transparency safeguard for high-risk AI systems.

The Loophole in the AI Act

The AI Act has faced criticism for allowing providers of AI systems categorized as high-risk to opt out of obligations based on broad criteria. This controversial loophole raises alarms about the potential for unregulated AI systems to proliferate. A vital safeguard against this damaging carve-out is the requirement for these providers to register their AI systems in an EU database. This measure enables necessary scrutiny and oversight over potential exploitations of the loophole. However, this transparency safeguard is currently under threat.

The Importance of Transparency

Maintaining transparency in AI system operations is crucial to ensure that providers cannot circumvent the core obligations laid out in the AI Act. The removal of the transparency obligation poses significant risks, allowing potentially dangerous AI systems to proliferate without oversight. As highlighted in earlier briefs regarding the AI Act Omnibus proposal, the failure to disclose an AI developer’s self-assessment leaves regulators and users without the means to make informed decisions. This lack of information can hinder their ability to investigate or avoid potentially harmful AI systems.

The Human Cost of Removing Safeguards

Eliminating the transparency obligation will incur a significant human cost in exchange for trivial cost savings for AI developers. This move threatens to undermine the enforceability of the AI Act drastically and worsen risks related to health, safety, and fundamental rights.

In conclusion, the call to reject the proposal that undermines the transparency safeguards of the AI Act is not just a technical concern; it’s a matter of public safety and accountability. The future of AI must be grounded in principles that prioritize human rights and ethical governance.

Read the full letter here.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...