NIST Unveils Draft AI Cybersecurity Framework for Public Input

NIST Releases Draft Framework for AI Cybersecurity, Solicits Public Comment

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has recently announced the release of draft guidelines aimed at applying its Cybersecurity Framework to organizations that are adopting artificial intelligence (AI). These guidelines, known as the Cyber AI Profile, are open for public comment until midnight on January 30, 2026.

Significance of the Cyber AI Profile

While the Cyber AI Profile is nonbinding, its importance lies in providing organizations with a structured approach to manage cybersecurity risks associated with AI systems. This document represents NIST’s first comprehensive effort to incorporate AI-specific risks and opportunities into the longstanding NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (CSF), which is widely utilized for managing cybersecurity risks.

Organizations involved in the development, deployment, procurement, or use of AI systems should consider the Cyber AI Profile as a preliminary indicator of how regulators, auditors, plaintiffs, and other stakeholders may assess reasonable cybersecurity and governance practices concerning AI-enabled systems.

Key Areas of Focus

The Cyber AI Profile addresses three crucial areas where the intersection of AI and cybersecurity presents notable challenges and opportunities:

  • Securing AI System Components: This section emphasizes identifying cybersecurity challenges when integrating AI into organizational ecosystems and infrastructure.
  • Conducting AI-Enabled Cyber Defense: This area focuses on identifying opportunities to leverage AI for enhancing cybersecurity processes and activities.
  • Thwarting AI-Enabled Cyber Attacks: This segment is dedicated to building resilience against new AI-enabled threat vectors.

Key Takeaways

  • This is an Initial Preliminary Draft of the Cyber AI Profile. It is designed to reflect current thinking on AI governance, and feedback will inform future iterations.
  • The Cyber AI Profile does not replace existing cybersecurity or AI governance frameworks; rather, it adds AI-specific priorities and considerations to the CSF 2.0.
  • This profile has the potential to become a de facto benchmark for regulators and agencies assessing cybersecurity diligence involving AI.

Overview of the Cyber AI Profile

The Cyber AI Profile is a NIST Cybersecurity Framework Community Profile that helps organizations prioritize cybersecurity outcomes in the context of AI systems. Notably, NIST intentionally avoids a narrow definition of “AI,” using the term “AI systems” to encompass all systems utilizing AI capabilities, whether they are standalone or integrated into other applications, infrastructure, and organizations.

In essence, the Cyber AI Profile:

  • Utilizes the CSF 2.0 Functions, Categories, and Subcategories (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover) to group similar cybersecurity measures.
  • Incorporates AI-specific considerations and proposed priorities for each Subcategory, such as the necessity of conducting AI audits to address needs like explainability.
  • Recognizes that organizations may be at various stages of AI adoption, ranging from limited machine learning tools to fully agentic or generative AI deployments.

Applications and Related Initiatives

The Cyber AI Profile targets a wide array of organizations, including those developing or utilizing AI technologies, whether as standalone systems or as AI-enabled capabilities integrated into other systems. It also serves organizations interested in understanding and leveraging the cybersecurity benefits that AI can offer, or in better defending against AI-enabled cyber-attacks.

To complement the Cyber AI Profile, NIST is developing a series of Control Overlays for Securing AI Systems (COSAiS) based on the NIST Special Publication (SP) 800-53 controls. This initiative will enable organizations to customize their baseline security measures to fit their specific contexts and needs.

Additionally, NIST has initiated a Request for Information concerning how to measure and improve the secure development and deployment of agentic AI systems, paving the way for more detailed guidance in the future.

Conclusion

The release of NIST’s Cyber AI Profile sends a clear message: AI is now a critical aspect of cybersecurity governance. Organizations that delay adapting their programs until formal regulations emerge may find themselves lagging behind evolving expectations.

As developments regarding the Cyber AI Profile and NIST’s COSAiS continue to unfold, stakeholders are encouraged to remain informed about how these frameworks might impact their AI deployments, cybersecurity posture, regulatory exposure, or contractual obligations.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...