New AI Regulations in Washington: Safeguarding Children and Mental Health

5 New Proposals to Regulate AI in Washington State

Washington state lawmakers are taking significant steps to regulate artificial intelligence (AI), introducing a series of bills aimed at addressing issues of discrimination, AI usage in schools, and imposing new obligations on companies developing emotionally responsive AI products. This legislative effort comes as Congress continues to debate AI oversight with minimal action, leaving states like Washington to create their own regulations.

Key Focus Areas

The proposed bills concentrate on critical areas, including:

  • Children
  • Mental Health
  • High-Stakes Decisions such as hiring, housing, and lending

These proposals are particularly relevant for HR software vendors, ed-tech companies, mental health startups, and generative AI platforms operating in Washington.

Proposed Bills Overview

Here’s a look at five AI-related bills that have been pre-filed before the official start of the legislative session:

HB 2157

This comprehensive bill aims to regulate high-risk AI systems that significantly influence decisions regarding employment, housing, credit, healthcare, education, insurance, and parole. Key requirements include:

  • Assessment and mitigation of discrimination risks
  • Disclosure of AI interaction to users
  • Explanation of how AI contributes to adverse decisions

The bill exempts low-risk tools such as spam filters and basic customer-service chatbots, but could impact a wide array of tech companies, with an effective date of January 1, 2027.

SB 5984

Requested by Governor Bob Ferguson, this bill focuses on AI companion chatbots. It mandates:

  • Repeated disclosures that an AI chatbot is not human
  • Prohibition of sexually explicit content for minors
  • Implementation of suicide-prevention protocols

Violations would fall under Washington’s Consumer Protection Act. The bill addresses concerns about emotional dependency and harmful ideation among minors interacting with AI.

SB 5870

This bill proposes civil liability for companies if an AI system is linked to a person’s suicide. Key points include:

  • Potential lawsuits if AI encourages self-harm or fails to direct users to crisis resources
  • Exclusion of defenses claiming harm was solely due to autonomous AI behavior

This measure aims to strengthen accountability in the design and operation of AI systems.

SB 5956

Targeting K-12 schools, this bill bans predictive “risk scores” that label students as potential troublemakers and prohibits real-time biometric surveillance like facial recognition. It emphasizes:

  • Human judgment in disciplinary decisions
  • Prohibition of AI as the sole basis for suspensions or expulsions

This proposal seeks to address concerns regarding fairness and equity in student discipline.

SB 5886

This proposal updates Washington’s right-of-publicity law to cover AI-generated forgeries, including convincing voice clones and synthetic images. Key aspects include:

  • Liability for using someone’s AI-generated likeness for commercial purposes without consent
  • Reinforcement of identity protections in the AI era

This legislation underscores the importance of protecting individuals’ identities amidst evolving technological capabilities.

As Washington state takes these steps forward, the implications of these regulations could serve as a model for other states grappling with the rapid advancement of AI technology.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...