NCOIL Advocates for State Control Over AI in Insurance Regulation

NCOIL Resolution Encourages State-Level Regulation of AI Use in Insurance

The National Council of Insurance Legislators (NCOIL) is currently considering a resolution that advocates for state-level regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) in the insurance sector, explicitly discouraging federal oversight. This resolution reflects a growing sentiment among state legislators regarding the need for localized governance in this rapidly evolving field.

Discussion Overview

A draft resolution was discussed on February 19 by the Joint State-Federal Relations & International Insurance Issues Committee, led by Committee Chair and New York Assembly Member Erik Dilan (D-District 54). The resolution emphasizes that the existing state-based regulatory framework established under the McCarran-Ferguson Act has effectively adapted to technological advancements while ensuring consumer protection and marketplace stability.

Opportunities and Risks of AI in Insurance

The resolution outlines the dual nature of AI in the insurance industry, noting that while it offers significant opportunities for efficiency and innovation, it also presents risks related to opacity, data governance, and consumer protections. This nuanced view acknowledges the potential benefits of AI, which is increasingly utilized in various aspects of insurance including:

  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • Underwriting
  • Claims handling
  • Fraud detection
  • Customer engagement
  • Customer service

Federal Actions and Concerns

The resolution expresses concern over recent federal actions that aim to limit state legislators’ ability to formulate policies regarding AI in insurance. Notably, it references a proposed 10-year moratorium on state legislative and regulatory authority over AI, as well as a controversial Executive Order that seeks to preempt state legislation.

NCOIL firmly believes that state legislators must retain the authority to craft policies that protect their constituents, who increasingly demand consumer safeguards in light of the uncertainties surrounding AI.

Future Steps

During discussions, Dilan highlighted his previous introduction of an NCOIL Model Act focused on the use of AI in financial services. However, he acknowledged the challenges in gaining consensus for its adoption, leading to a recommendation to pause its development.

This pause allows stakeholders to observe how legislative landscapes evolve across states concerning AI.

Encouragement for State Actions

If the resolution is approved, it will encourage states to:

  • Take necessary legislative actions that protect consumers without stifling innovation.
  • Implement principles-based regulations that emphasize transparency, accountability, data integrity, and fair discrimination.
  • Coordinate efforts to ensure consistency while allowing flexibility to address local market conditions.

Committee Perspectives

While no vote was taken on the resolution during the recent committee meeting, a vote is anticipated in April. Dilan remarked on the importance of this resolution in pushing back against federal overreach, supported by New York Assembly Member Jared Gondalfo (R-District 7), who emphasized the necessity of ongoing discussions about AI due to its rapidly changing nature.

Utah Representative Jim Dunnigan (R-District 36) echoed these sentiments, suggesting that states should act as “laboratories” to determine the best approaches for their unique circumstances.

In summary, the NCOIL resolution represents a significant step towards empowering state legislators to navigate the complexities of AI in the insurance industry while ensuring that consumer protections remain a priority.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...