Musk’s Orbital AI Ambitions: The SpaceX-xAI Merger and Its Implications

“Jane! Stop this Crazy Thing!” Artificial Intelligence Antitrust Questions Get Extraterrestrial

SpaceX’s acquisition of xAI, valued at approximately $1.25 trillion, represents one of the most consequential mergers ever announced in the technology and aerospace sectors. This deal promises to be controversial, drawing parallels to another Musk-buys-Musk deal from a decade ago. The merger is likely to face significant pushback, rooted in antitrust and national security concerns.

Background of the Companies

Elon Musk founded SpaceX in 2002, owning 42% of its equity and holding 79% of voting rights. In March 2023, he established xAI, where he remains the CEO and majority owner. The deal merges SpaceX’s roughly $1 trillion valuation with xAI’s estimated $250 billion through a share-exchange transaction. This consolidation integrates launch dominance, global satellite communications, and next-generation artificial intelligence under one private enterprise, aiming to achieve Musk’s vision of a comprehensive space-based solar-powered AI-compute infrastructure.

Why SpaceX Says It Needs Orbital Compute

SpaceX pursued the acquisition because it believes that terrestrial data-center growth will soon encounter energy, land-use, and cooling constraints. Musk argues that the long-term, lowest-cost method of powering large-scale AI compute is to relocate it off Earth, where continuous solar power and natural radiative cooling facilitate hyperscale computing without the burdens imposed on terrestrial grids.

Musk expects orbital compute to become cost-competitive within a few years, with Starlink V3 satellites and future Starship-launched platforms serving as the backbone of this extraterrestrial AI infrastructure. The plan aims to combine Falcon and Starship for launch capacity, Starlink for in-orbit infrastructure, and Grok for AI models, along with planned orbital data-center constellations.

Concerns Raised by the SpaceX / xAI Deal

A merger of this magnitude raises immediate antitrust and national-security concerns in several areas:

  • Federal contracts: SpaceX manages billions in contracts with NASA, the Department of Defense, and the intelligence community.
  • Corporate governance: There are intertwined leadership roles and sensitive data flows across Musk’s companies.
  • Market power: SpaceX’s ambition to deploy up to one million satellites for orbital AI computing could create structural advantages that are difficult for competitors to match.
  • Global security power: Musk’s ownership of thousands of Starlink satellites gives him unique influence as a private actor in global security, affecting orbital safety and international strategic planning.

Competition in the Orbital Compute Space

The rapid consolidation of launch services, satellite networks, and AI development within SpaceX intensifies scrutiny regarding competition in the emerging market for orbital AI compute. Although several companies are exploring this space, none match SpaceX’s level of vertical integration.

Google is developing Project Suncatcher, aiming for a 2027 prototype constellation using satellite-borne TPUs to run AI workloads, but remains years away from operational orbital compute. Axiom Space is building dedicated orbital data-center modules, while Loft Orbital has flown multi-node AI compute systems in space. Amazon’s Project Kuiper is focused on broadband rather than compute, and startups like Starcloud have demonstrated in-orbit GPU operations but lack the capital for large-scale competition.

Historical Context: Tesla’s 2016 Acquisition of SolarCity

The SpaceX / xAI deal mirrors Musk’s previous acquisition of SolarCity by Tesla in 2016, which sparked corporate governance disputes. Tesla’s $2.6 billion acquisition of SolarCity, a distressed company, led to allegations of a conflicted bailout. The court ultimately ruled in favor of the deal, emphasizing the importance of conflict-management safeguards.

Antitrust Investigation Is Essential

The acquisition positions SpaceX at the center of a rapidly forming market for orbital AI compute. While Google stands as the strongest long-term contender, Axiom operates most maturely, and Loft leads in defense integration. SpaceX, however, is the only company that possesses proprietary launch capacity, operational broadband mega-constellations, and a formal FCC filing for a dedicated orbital compute constellation.

Speculation exists regarding a potential future merger with Tesla, which has invested $2 billion into xAI. This merger could potentially threaten rivals such as OpenAI.

In conclusion, the path to realizing Musk’s vision for an orbital solar-powered AI constellation is fraught with challenges. The substantial vertical integration and the merger that brings AI fully into the world’s most capable launch and satellite operator necessitate thorough examination by antitrust law enforcers.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...