Tort Law as a Tool for Mitigating Catastrophic AI Risk
In the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence (AI), the implications of deploying advanced AI systems have raised significant concerns regarding safety and accountability. One potential solution to these concerns lies in the framework of tort law, which serves to compel AI companies to internalize risks associated with their technologies.
The Role of Tort Law in AI Governance
Professor Gabriel Weil’s upcoming discussion will delve into how tort law can be instrumental in shaping the accountability of AI developers. He will propose a liability framework that emphasizes strict liability, ensuring that companies are held responsible for any damages caused by their AI systems, regardless of fault.
Key Components of the Liability Framework
The framework suggested by Professor Weil includes:
- Strict Liability: This principle holds companies accountable for harm caused by their AI technologies without the need to prove negligence.
- Liability Insurance Requirements: These would scale with the potential risks associated with specific AI models, ensuring that companies are financially prepared to cover damages.
- Punitive Damages: Designed for uninsurable risks, these would serve as a deterrent against negligence and misconduct.
The Doctrinal and Normative Case for Strict Liability
In his talk, Professor Weil will also explore the doctrinal and normative arguments for adopting strict liability as a central pillar in the governance of AI. This approach aims to create a robust legal framework that not only addresses current risks but also anticipates future challenges posed by advanced AI systems.
About the Speaker
Professor Gabriel Weil is an Associate Professor at Touro University Law Center and a Non-Resident Senior Fellow at the Institute for Law & AI. His expertise lies in the intersection of liability and catastrophic AI risk, and he frequently collaborates with legislators and policymakers on AI-related issues.
With a solid academic foundation, including a J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center and an LL.M. in Environmental Law from Pace University, Professor Weil’s background encompasses crucial work in climate change policy, further enhancing his insights into regulatory frameworks.
Conclusion
As AI technology continues to advance, the necessity for a comprehensive legal framework becomes increasingly critical. Professor Weil’s insights on tort law present a promising avenue for mitigating risks associated with AI, ensuring that accountability and safety remain at the forefront of technological development.
