Maryland Moves to Regulate AI-Generated Misinformation Ahead of Elections

Maryland Lawmakers Push for AI Regulations Ahead of Elections

As the 2026 election cycle approaches, Maryland Senator Katie Fry Hester is spearheading initiatives to regulate artificial intelligence (AI). Her efforts focus on ensuring the integrity of elections amidst the rising threat of AI-generated misinformation.

Legislation on Deepfakes

One of Hester’s primary bills, SB0141, recently passed through the Senate with unanimous bipartisan support. This legislation specifically targets the use of AI-generated deepfakes aimed at spreading election-related misinformation.

According to Deputy State Prosecutor Sarah David, the bill criminalizes acts such as depicting a polling place as being on fire or misleading voters into believing that they do not need to vote. This law would empower the state administrator of elections to seek injunctions for the removal of such misinformation from online platforms, ensuring that correct information is disseminated promptly.

Once the misinformation is taken down, the state would have the authority to pursue civil actions against offenders, with penalties including fines of up to $5,000 and potential imprisonment for up to five years.

Support from Election Officials

Jared DeMarinis, Maryland’s Administrator of Elections, expressed strong support for the bill, emphasizing its potential to enhance voter empowerment by swiftly countering false information.

Broader Implications of AI Regulations

In addition to SB0141, Hester has introduced another bill, SB0008, which outlines legal consequences for creating deepfakes that impersonate individuals with malicious intent. This legislation addresses a growing concern as political opponents increasingly exploit AI technology to defame candidates.

Hester articulated that misrepresentation through AI constitutes a form of identity theft. The bill provides victims with avenues for civil action, allowing them to seek restitution for damages, including reasonable attorney fees.

Intent and Exceptions in Legislation

It is important to note that the bill does not criminalize the use of AI outright; rather, it emphasizes the intent behind creating misleading deepfakes. Additionally, the legislation contains exceptions for satire, parody, and media that provide appropriate disclosures.

Depending on the severity of the offense, violators could face charges ranging from misdemeanor to felony, with fines reaching $25,000 and possible imprisonment for up to 20 years.

Status of the Legislation

As of now, Senate Bill 8 has not yet undergone a vote in committee, but the momentum behind these regulations reflects a growing recognition of the need to address the challenges posed by advancing AI technologies in the political landscape.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...