Maritime Union Calls for AI Regulation to Safeguard Australian Jobs

Media Alert: Maritime Union Demands AI Regulation to Protect Jobs and Supply Chain Sovereignty

Date: Monday, 23 March 2026 at 2pm

Location: APH – 27M House of Reps Courtyard

Event: Report Launch and Press Conference

Introduction

Amidst a global supply chain crisis and escalating oil prices, the Maritime Union of Australia (MUA) has urged the Albanese Government to take swift action in regulating AI technologies within crucial supply chain sectors, particularly in stevedoring and port services. This demand arises as Dubai Ports implements an automation and AI control project across its container terminals in Australia.

Background

Dubai Ports operates four major terminals located in Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne, and Sydney, effectively dominating the Australian container terminal market. The company is pushing an AI and automation agenda, influenced by its former global CEO, Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, who faced significant controversies, including his involvement in the Epstein Files.

As the fifth largest port operator globally, owned by the Government of Dubai and Gulf royal families, Dubai Ports extracts substantial profits from Australian businesses while contributing minimally to tax revenues. Notably, the company has not paid corporate income tax in Australia for over a decade, raising concerns about its economic impact.

Threats to Employment

The MUA’s new report, titled “Job Losses and Profit Shifting at DP World: How AI Automation Threatens Australia’s Economic Wellbeing”, highlights the potential for job losses due to the proposed automation strategies. The report suggests that up to 1,000 jobs (over 60% of the workforce) are at risk as skilled, unionized roles are replaced by driverless vehicles and remotely operated cranes.

This drive towards automation contradicts the Australian Government’s National AI Plan, which emphasizes the need for consultation with workers and unions. Current evidence indicates that the primary motive behind this automation push is not to enhance supply chain efficiency but rather to reduce labor costs and maximize profits, ultimately leading to inflated costs for businesses and consumers.

Call for Action

The MUA continues to advocate for policies that ensure supply chain sovereignty to protect the Australian economy from global shocks, such as the recent oil crisis exacerbated by geopolitical tensions.

Key recommendations from the report include:

  • Implement strict oversight, transparency, and accountability for AI systems in the workplace.
  • Protect worker data and prohibit invasive surveillance practices.
  • Prioritize safety, job security, and public benefit over corporate profit.
  • Guarantee full bargaining rights and protected industrial action when AI or automation is introduced.
  • Enhance tax transparency and combat profit shifting and offshore royalty payments.

Conclusion

As the MUA’s National Secretary, Jake Field, states, the increasing reliance on AI and automation in Australian ports poses significant risks. The potential for foreign interference and the prioritization of corporate interests over national security and economic stability raises alarm. The MUA stands firm in its commitment to protecting Australian workers and ensuring that the risks associated with AI automation do not undermine the integrity of critical infrastructure.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...