Ireland’s Strategic Roadmap for Implementing the EU AI Act

Government Approval of Roadmap for Implementing the EU Artificial Intelligence Act

On March 4, 2025, the government approved a pivotal recommendation from the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment, Peter Burke, regarding the implementation of the EU Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act. This decision marks a significant step in establishing a distributed model of implementation, leveraging the expertise of established sectoral regulators.

Designated Competent Authorities

The government designated an initial list of eight public bodies to act as competent authorities responsible for implementing and enforcing the Act within their respective sectors. These authorities include:

  • Central Bank of Ireland
  • Commission for Communications Regulation
  • Commission for Railway Regulation
  • Competition and Consumer Protection Commission
  • Data Protection Commission
  • Health and Safety Authority
  • Health Products Regulatory Authority
  • Marine Survey Office of the Department of Transport

Additional authorities and a lead regulator will be appointed in the future to ensure comprehensive implementation of the Act.

Strategic Importance of AI Regulation

Minister Burke emphasized that AI presents Ireland with a strategic opportunity. He noted the potential benefits for the economy, including:

  • Increased productivity for businesses
  • Enhanced innovation
  • Improved customer services
  • Better public services for the general population
  • Accelerated advancements in science and medicine

He stated, “To capture these benefits, we must build trust in AI systems,” highlighting the importance of the EU AI Act as a landmark regulation for both Ireland and the EU.

Implementation Framework

Minister of State for Trade Promotion, Artificial Intelligence, and Digital Transformation, Niamh Smyth, commented on the government’s decision to utilize existing national frameworks for the enforcement of the EU AI Act. This approach is expected to facilitate compliance for businesses and is aligned with the government’s commitment to establishing Ireland as an EU centre of expertise for digital and data regulation.

Key Elements of the EU AI Act

The EU AI Act establishes a harmonized regulatory framework aimed at ensuring a high level of protection for individuals’ health, safety, and fundamental rights while promoting the adoption of human-centric, trustworthy AI. Key elements include:

  • Prohibited AI Practices: Eight AI practices will be banned due to their unacceptable risk starting in February 2025, such as:
    • Subliminal techniques causing significant harm
    • Exploitation of vulnerabilities based on age or economic situation
    • Social scoring leading to unfair treatment
    • Profiling for predicting criminal activity
    • Untargeted scraping of facial images
    • Inferring emotions in workplaces or educational institutions
    • Biometric categorization based on personal identities
    • Real-time remote biometric identification for law enforcement
  • High-Risk AI Systems: Stringent conditions must be met by providers and deployers of high-risk AI systems before they can be placed on the market.
  • Transparency Requirements: These will apply to lower-order risk AI systems, such as chatbots, starting from August 2026.
  • General Purpose AI Obligations: Providers of General Purpose AI models will face obligations to mitigate risks starting in August 2025.
  • Penalties: Substantial fines of up to €35 million or 7% of global turnover may be imposed for infringements of the Act.

The Act is designed to be risk-based, ensuring that regulatory requirements are proportionate to the risks presented by different AI systems. Most AI systems are classified as low risk and are not subject to regulatory requirements.

Conclusion

The EU AI Act represents a significant advancement in the regulation of artificial intelligence, promoting a balance between innovation and safety. As Ireland moves forward with its implementation, the focus will remain on fostering a trustworthy AI ecosystem that prioritizes the rights and safety of individuals while enhancing the nation’s competitive edge in the digital landscape.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...