India’s New AI Regulations: Legal Implications for Global Companies

Global Firms Face Legal Risks Under India’s 2026 AI Regulation

India has strengthened its AI regulation through amendments to the IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, effective February 20, 2026. The revised rules mandate prominent labeling of AI-generated content and introduce expedited takedown timelines as short as two to three hours.

Social media platforms and technology companies operating in India must proactively align their compliance systems with the new regulatory mandate to mitigate enforcement risk, monetary penalties, and potential legal proceedings.

How India Regulates AI-Generated Content Under the IT Act

India does not regulate AI as a standalone technology. Instead, it regulates the outputs of AI systems when such outputs are hosted, transmitted, or enabled by digital intermediaries that violate Indian law.

Changes to the IT Rules expand compliance obligations around:

  • Synthetic or AI-generated content
  • Deepfakes and impersonation
  • Non-consensual sensitive imagery
  • Misleading and harmful content
  • Expedited removal timelines

For foreign AI companies, generative AI platforms, social media intermediaries, and content-hosting services operating in India, compliance is now product-level and real-time based.

Deepfake Regulation and AI Content Labeling Requirements

The latest rules impose explicit labeling obligations. Online platforms must adhere to the following requirements:

  • Clearly and prominently label AI-generated or synthetically generated content in a manner visible to users.
  • Ensure that AI-related labels, watermarks, or metadata cannot be removed, altered, or suppressed.
  • Obtain user declarations where content has been created or materially altered using AI systems.
  • Implement reasonable technical measures to verify and track AI-origin information.

The requirement of “prominence” remains legally enforceable, ensuring that disclosures are conspicuous and accessible.

Compliance Implications for Platforms

These obligations extend beyond policy disclosures and require product-level implementation, including:

  • Preservation of backend metadata and watermark integrity
  • Deployment of provenance-tracking mechanisms
  • Maintenance of audit logs for regulatory review

Once content qualifies as synthetic or AI-generated under the rules, labeling is mandatory.

Compressed Takedown Timelines

India has introduced aggressive AI content removal timelines, including:

  1. Non-consensual intimate imagery: 2 hours
  2. Other unlawful content: 3 hours
  3. Privacy or impersonation complaints: 24 hours
  4. Grievance resolution: 72 hours

Failure to act within prescribed timelines may result in:

  • Loss of safe harbor protection
  • Criminal liability exposure
  • Blocking orders under Section 69A
  • Regulatory enforcement actions

Legal Basis for Regulating AI Content in India

AI-generated content in India is regulated under two laws:

  1. The Information Technology (IT) Act, 2000
  2. The IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021

Safe harbor protection under Section 79 of the IT Act applies only if intermediaries comply with due diligence requirements. This protection does not grant blanket immunity; it is contingent upon responsible actions by the platforms.

Proactive Safeguard Obligations for AI-Enabled Platforms

Platforms that enable AI content creation must deploy:

  • “Reasonable and appropriate” technical safeguards
  • Systems to prevent impersonation and misrepresentation
  • Rapid disablement tools
  • Account suspension mechanisms
  • Monitoring workflows for synthetic content misuse

Additional Requirements for Large Platforms (SSMIs)

Platforms classified as Significant Social Media Intermediaries (SSMIs) must appoint key compliance officers and publish monthly compliance reports.

Enforcement Trends Relevant to AI Platforms

Recent enforcement patterns have included:

  • Blocking of websites hosting child sexual abuse material
  • Directions to disable services facilitating non-consensual imagery
  • Platform bans, including OTT services

Conclusion

India’s regulatory model subjects AI-generated content to strict accountability standards. Foreign AI companies must establish real-time moderation capabilities, embed AI governance mechanisms, and develop local compliance infrastructure to navigate this evolving legal landscape.

Digital compliance is increasingly scrutinized for multinational technology companies operating in India. Implementing these regulatory requirements is no longer a voluntary ethical layer but a legal operating condition.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...