India’s AI Governance Framework: Balancing Innovation and Responsibility

How India’s New AI Framework Targets Risks, Bias, and Misuse

Ahead of the five-day AI Impact Summit 2026, the Indian government has unveiled its first set of comprehensive artificial intelligence (AI) governance guidelines.

The framework is built on principles and existing laws, introducing new oversight bodies to maintain a balance between innovation and safeguards.

This move demonstrates India’s commitment to responsible AI governance without enacting a standalone law, addressing issues such as bias, misuse, and lack of transparency in AI systems, while ensuring that technological adoption is not hindered.

Guidelines Overview

The newly released guidelines detail how AI should be developed and deployed in sectors like healthcare, education, agriculture, finance, and governance.

The framework is based on seven broad principles, or sutras:

  • Trust as the foundation
  • People First
  • Innovation over Restraint
  • Fairness and Equity
  • Accountability
  • Understandable by Design
  • Safety, Resilience, and Sustainability

These principles emphasize that AI systems should support human decision-making processes while being transparent to avoid discrimination, with clear safeguards in place.

Legal Framework

A key aspect of the guidelines is their reliance on existing laws. Officials have indicated that many AI-related risks are already covered under current legal provisions, such as IT rules, data protection laws, and criminal statutes.

Instead of enacting a separate AI law at this time, the government has opted for periodic reviews and targeted amendments as technology evolves.

Proposed National Oversight Bodies

The framework proposes the establishment of national-level bodies to oversee AI governance. These include:

  • An AI Governance Group for policy coordination across ministries
  • A Technology and Policy Expert Committee for specialist advice
  • An AI Safety Institute focusing on testing standards, safety research, and risk assessment

Responsibilities of AI Developers and Deployers

The guidelines also define responsibilities for AI developers and deployers, such as:

  • Transparency reports
  • Clear disclosures when using AI-generated content
  • Grievance redressal mechanisms for those affected by these systems

High-risk applications, especially those impacting safety, rights, or livelihoods, are expected to follow stronger safeguards with human oversight.

Conclusion

The guidelines reflect India’s belief that AI should not be limited to a few companies or countries but should be widely deployed to address real-world problems while remaining trustworthy.

By balancing innovation with safeguards, the government hopes to position India as not just a major user of AI but also a global leader in responsible and inclusive governance, aligned with the vision of ‘Viksit Bharat 2047’.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...