Impact of AI on the Future of Financial Services

FCA Studying Impact of AI on Financial Services

The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has initiated the Mills review and a call for input regarding the long-term impact of advanced AI on retail financial services, focusing on the years leading to 2030 and beyond.

Engagement Themes

The engagement paper categorizes questions into four key themes:

  • The evolution of AI technologies (including increasingly autonomous, agentic systems)
  • Potential effects on firms and market structure
  • Expected consumer trends
  • The future regulatory approach (including the viability of Consumer Duty and the SMCR)

While wholesale markets are not included in this scope, relevant spill-overs to retail may be considered. Feedback is invited by late February 2026, with recommendations to the FCA Board and a public report anticipated in the summer.

Appointment of Financial Services AI Champions

In a separate development, the Government has appointed two Financial Services AI ChampionsHarriet Rees from Starling Bank and Dr Rohit Dhawan from Lloyds Banking Group. Their role is to advise HM Treasury on high-impact use cases and to engage with regulators, providing practical insights for the Mills review and any SMCR guidance on AI governance. These appointments are set to run until September 30, 2026, subject to extension.

Current Regulatory Landscape

As of now, the FCA has not proposed specific rules addressing AI, and the UK Government has yet to implement comprehensive AI legislation. However, these developments could signify a shift in regulatory approach. In the interim, the direction aligns with stronger governance and accountability for AI in retail markets.

Firms should prepare for heightened scrutiny regarding systems and controls, model oversight, and testing where AI influences product design, distribution, eligibility, or customer redress.

Practical Steps for Firms

In the near term, practical steps for firms include:

  • Mapping AI use cases
  • Clarifying senior manager responsibilities
  • Evidencing challenges and testing
  • Aligning consumer outcomes with the spirit of the Consumer Duty

This approach reflects a broader trend toward robust, evidence-based governance and clear, defensible disclosures when technology materially impacts customer outcomes. Although the review primarily focuses on retail markets, firms in wholesale markets should ensure they maintain robust governance regarding AI usage.

In conclusion, as the FCA progresses with the Mills review and the appointment of AI Champions, the financial services landscape is poised for significant transformation, driven by AI advancements and regulatory adaptations.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...