Illinois Mandates AI Disclosure in Employment Decisions

Illinois Now Requires Employers to Disclose the Use of AI for Employment-Related Decisions

As of January 1, 2026, the Illinois Human Rights Act has undergone significant amendments mandating that employers must disclose the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in any employment-related decisions. This includes critical processes such as hiring, promotion, and discipline.

Definition of AI Under the Illinois Human Rights Act

The definition of AI within this Act is notably broad. It encompasses machine-based systems that can infer from inputs to generate outputs such as predictions, recommendations, or decisions that influence both physical and virtual environments. Additionally, it includes generative AI technologies that produce outputs simulating human-generated content. This definition necessitates that employers meticulously assess any software or tools employed in employment contexts that may include AI components.

Notification Requirements for Employment-Related Decisions

Under the amended Act, employers are now required to notify employees about the use of AI in various employment-related decisions, which consist of:

  • Recruitment
  • Hiring
  • Promotion
  • Renewal of Employment
  • Selection for Training or Apprenticeship
  • Discharge
  • Discipline
  • Tenure
  • Terms, Privileges, or Conditions of Employment

This broad scope implies that any use of AI in these decisions, regardless of the magnitude of its influence, must be disclosed. Failing to provide such notification may lead to a civil rights violation under the Illinois Human Rights Act.

Prohibition of Discrimination Based on Protected Classes

The amendments also prohibit the use of AI in employment-related decisions that could lead to discrimination based on a protected class or zip code, particularly when the latter is used as a proxy for a protected class. The protected classes identified in the Illinois Human Rights Act include:

  • Race
  • Color
  • Religion
  • National Origin
  • Age
  • Sex
  • Marital Status
  • Disability

Regulatory Oversight

The Illinois Department of Human Rights is tasked with establishing rules that pertain to the conditions under which notification is required. This includes defining the relevant time frame and methods for providing such notifications.

In conclusion, the amendments to the Illinois Human Rights Act signal a significant shift towards greater transparency and accountability in the use of AI for employment decisions, ensuring that employees are informed and protected against potential biases.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...