GSA Introduces AI Contract Clause: Key Implications for Contractors

GSA Proposes New Contract Clause Focused on the Government Use of AI

On March 6, 2026, the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) issued a draft version of a new contract clause, GSAR 552.239-7001, titled “GSA Federal Acquisition Service Proposed Government AI System Terms and Conditions”. This clause is intended for insertion in GSA solicitations and contracts concerning Artificial Intelligence capabilities. The GSA is currently seeking industry feedback on this draft until March 20, 2026, and plans to incorporate it into all existing and new Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) contracts during the upcoming “mass modification,” Refresh 31.

Background

This initiative follows the decision by the president and the Department of War (DoW) to designate Anthropic as a supply chain risk, leading to its removal from GSA contract programs. The new clause mandates that contractors ensure their AI providers agree to the government’s use of an AI system or service for any “lawful Government purpose.” This requirement stems from a well-publicized dispute between Anthropic and the DoW.

Key Provisions of the Draft Clause

The proposed clause includes several significant requirements:

  • Agencies purchasing through GSA contracts will receive an “irrevocable, royalty-free, non-exclusive license” to use the AI system for any lawful government purpose.
  • This license extends to integrating the AI system with government systems as necessary.
  • Prime contractors using another vendor’s AI products must secure these rights with any service provider at any tier below the prime contract level.

Compliance Requirements

Additional compliance requirements under the draft clause include:

  1. Disclosing all AI systems used in contract performance.
  2. Using only “American AI Systems”.
  3. Providing AI systems that enable human oversight by government officials.
  4. Reporting security incidents via CISA forms within 72 hours.
  5. Notifying the government in advance of changes to AI system or service providers.
  6. Making commercial efforts to ensure compliance with “Unbiased AI Principles.”
  7. Permitting government evaluation and remediation rights.
  8. Providing documentation of compliance upon government request.

Implementation Timeline

Once finalized, GSA contracting officers will be required to insert this clause in all GSA-issued solicitations and contracts when AI capabilities are involved, as well as in all new and existing MAS contracts. The GSA aims to incorporate this clause into all MAS contracts via Refresh 31, giving contractors 60 days to accept it. While there is no specific date for the issuance of Refresh 31, it was originally anticipated in February 2026.

Industry Concerns

As the first federal contract clause addressing AI, the draft has raised several concerns:

  • Clarity of defined terms, such as “Artificial Intelligence (AI) System.”
  • Undefined terms like “lawful Government purpose.”
  • Authority of the government under the GSA MAS program to impose deviations from commercial practices.

These questions highlight the complexities and potential implications of the draft clause, indicating a need for further clarification and dialogue within the industry.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...