Global Tech Giants Urge South Korea for AI Regulation Flexibility

Global Tech Companies Seek Flexibility in South Korea’s AI Basic Act

On March 18, 2025, significant discussions took place between artificial intelligence (AI) policy officials from major global tech companies, including OpenAI and Google, and representatives from the South Korean government. The primary focus of these meetings was to request greater flexibility in the implementation of the AI Basic Act.

Context of the AI Basic Act

Passed by the National Assembly in December 2024, the AI Basic Act is set to take effect in January 2026. It is a landmark piece of legislation aimed at promoting the AI industry while ensuring the safe use of AI technologies. Notably, this act is considered the world’s second AI law, following the comprehensive regulations established by the European Union.

Meetings with Government Officials

During the meetings, Sandy Kunvatanagarn from OpenAI, along with Alice Hunt Friend and Eunice Huang from Google, engaged with officials from the Ministry of Science and ICT. Additionally, Jared Ragland from the Business Software Alliance (BSA)—which represents around 70 global software companies, including Adobe Inc., IBM Corp., and Microsoft Corp.—also held separate discussions with the ministry.

Requests for Regulatory Flexibility

One of the central themes of these discussions was the request for a more flexible application of regulations, particularly in contrast to the strict AI regulations currently enforced in the EU. The participants expressed concerns regarding the scope of operator liability and sought clarity on the definition of high-impact applications within the context of the new law.

Next Steps for the Ministry

The ICT ministry is actively working on devising enforcement ordinances that will govern the implementation of the AI Basic Act. As the ministry prepares for the enforcement of this legislation, the feedback from industry leaders will likely play a crucial role in shaping the final regulations.

As the landscape of artificial intelligence continues to evolve, the dialogue between tech companies and governmental bodies remains essential for fostering innovation while ensuring public safety and accountability.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...