Framework for Global AI Governance: Priorities and Pathways

Guidance for the New Global Dialogue on AI Governance

This policy brief proposes an integrated, sequenced, United Nations (UN)-anchored roadmap for the new Annual Global Dialogue on AI Governance.

Its purpose is to help identify the key priorities the Global Dialogue needs to address, translate them into actionable design by outlining the contours of a Global AI Governance Roadmap (thereafter known as the “Roadmap”), and design the process required to deliver it.

In doing so, the brief aims for two goals:

  1. Structure a multistakeholder process that is practical, transparent, and predictable.
  2. Support implementation of the Pact for the Future and the Global Digital Compact.

Guidance for the New Global Dialogue on AI Governance Roadmap

Pillar I: Managing AI Risks

Outcome 1: Shared scientific and safety capacity for frontier models.

Annex I: Global Frontier AI Evaluation Framework

A common testing and evaluation framework co-developed with IISP-AI and regulators; shared risk categories; disclosure thresholds; baseline transparency requirements.

Outcome 2: Ethical and democratic safeguards for information ecosystems.

Annex II: Declaration on AI and Information Integrity

A negotiated declaration establishing expectations for content authenticity, electoral safeguards, platform obligations, and human oversight in communicative environments.

Pillar II: Distributing AI Rewards

Outcome 3: Equitable access to compute, data, skills, and innovation capacity.

Annex III: AI Infrastructure Access Framework

A global framework linking regional capacity hubs, shared compute access, multilingual datasets, and a voluntary trust fund or credit mechanism.

Outcome 4: Responsible and accountable AI in public administration.

Annex IV: Responsible Public-Sector AI Guidelines

A set of minimum operational standards for procurement, transparency, auditability, and human oversight in government AI systems, including for private contractors.

Pillar III: Aligning AI Rules

Outcome 5: Reduced regulatory fragmentation and improved baseline coherence.

Annex V: Regulatory Interoperability Mechanism

A mechanism defining minimum global documentation and disclosure baselines; templates for mutual recognition; and a UN facilitation platform.

Outcome 6: A coherent global institutional architecture for AI governance.

Annex VI: Institutional Coherence Options Paper

A mapping of existing bodies and three coordination models (council, inter-agency mechanism, observatory) with functions, reporting lines, and options for long-term architecture.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...