Florida’s New Legislation Mandates Human Review in AI Claim Denials

New Proposed Legislation in Florida Regarding AI Use in Claims Handling

The landscape of insurance claims processing is on the brink of significant change with the introduction of new legislation in Florida, specifically HB 527 and its companion bill SB 202. These proposed laws aim to impose strict regulations on the use of artificial intelligence (AI), algorithms, and machine learning systems in the claims handling process.

Mandatory Human Reviews

One of the cornerstone provisions of these bills is the requirement for mandatory human reviews of claim denials. The legislation explicitly stipulates that information derived from AI systems cannot serve as the sole basis for adjusting or denying claims, either in full or in part. This move addresses concerns over the potential for AI to make erroneous or biased decisions without adequate human oversight.

Detailed Claims Handling Manuals

Insurers will be required to provide a comprehensive description of how AI and other automated systems will be used in their claims handling procedures. This information must be included in their claims handling manual, ensuring transparency and compliance with the law.

Qualifications for Reviewers

The legislation mandates that individuals who review claim denials must be qualified human professionals. Specifically, these are individuals authorized to adjust or deny claims under the Florida Insurance Code. Their responsibilities include:

  • Independently analyzing the facts of the claim and the terms of the insurance policy, free from AI influence.
  • Reviewing the accuracy of any output generated by AI or algorithmic systems.
  • Determining whether the claim is payable under the terms of the insurance policy.

Legislative Intent

The sponsors of these bills argue that they address a pressing challenge in the insurance market, offering a clear and reasonable safeguard against decisions made solely by algorithms. This initiative reflects a growing recognition of the need for human oversight in an era increasingly dominated by technology.

Regulatory Context

In 2023, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) approved a model bulletin regarding AI’s use within the insurance sector. This bulletin emphasizes the necessity for processes and controls that guard against inaccuracies, discriminatory biases, and data vulnerabilities inherent in AI systems. It serves as a reminder that insurers must also comply with established regulatory frameworks, such as the Unfair Trade Practices Model Act, which governs unfair competition and deceptive practices.

Potential Challenges

Despite its intentions, this proposed legislation may face challenges at the federal level. Recently, an executive order was signed by the President, which blocks states from enforcing individual laws regulating artificial intelligence. The outcome of this legislative initiative remains to be seen as various stakeholders navigate the intersection of technology and regulation.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...