Federal Order Aims to Centralize AI Regulation

Federal Executive Order Seeks to Stop State and Local AI Regulation

A new federal executive order aims to halt state and local regulation of artificial intelligence (AI), arguing that fragmented laws could undermine U.S. competitiveness. This move raises significant questions regarding federal preemption, state authority, and the future of locally driven AI safeguards.

A recent article discusses last month’s federal executive order aimed at curbing state and local government regulation of AI. The order asserts that a patchwork of state laws could hinder U.S. competitiveness and innovation. This decision follows Congress’s move to drop a proposed federal moratorium on state AI regulation, setting the stage for renewed federal-state tension over AI governance.

Key Provisions of the Executive Order

The executive order, titled “Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence,” advances a federal strategy to establish a uniform, minimally burdensome national approach to AI. It directs multiple federal agencies to limit or deter state and local AI laws that the administration views as conflicting with federal priorities or constitutional principles.

Key provisions of the executive order include:

  • AI Litigation Task Force: The order directs the U.S. Attorney General to establish a Department of Justice task force dedicated to challenging state AI laws in court, including on grounds of federal preemption, interstate commerce, or constitutional violations.
  • Federal Evaluation of State Laws: The Secretary of Commerce must evaluate existing state AI laws within 90 days and identify those deemed “onerous,” particularly laws requiring altered AI outputs or extensive disclosures that may raise First Amendment concerns.
  • Funding Conditions and Restrictions: Access to certain federal funds, such as non-deployment funding under the $42.5 billion Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program, may be conditioned on a state’s AI regulatory posture, to the maximum extent allowed by law.
  • Preemption and National Standards: The order calls for legislative recommendations to establish a federal AI framework that expressly preempts conflicting state laws and directs agencies to explore national reporting, disclosure, and enforcement standards for AI.

This executive order is expected to face legal pushback from states and localities that have already enacted AI laws addressing transparency, bias, privacy, discrimination, and public safety. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, all 50 states and several territories considered AI legislation in 2025, underscoring the breadth of state involvement in this policy area.

As the landscape of AI governance continues to evolve, the implications of this executive order will be closely monitored by both federal and state authorities.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...