Federal AI Policy Framework and Insights on State Regulation

State AI Laws Under Federal Scrutiny

On December 11, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order titled “Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence” (Executive Order 14365). This order establishes a federal policy aimed at addressing the growing number of state-level AI regulations governing the AI ecosystem, with the goal to sustain and enhance the United States’ global AI dominance through a minimally burdensome national policy framework for AI.

Executive Order 14365: Overview

Building on the Trump Administration’s AI Action Plan issued on July 23, 2025, and legislative efforts to initiate a moratorium on state AI laws, the Executive Order sets out a plan to curb the proliferation of state AI laws and leverage various federal tools to discourage and challenge state regulations that conflict with the Administration’s policies.

However, since federal preemption typically stems from congressional enactments rather than executive orders, Executive Order 14365 may not independently displace state AI laws but rather provide guidance for federal agencies and official conduct under the policy framework.

Key Policy Objectives

Under Executive Order 14365, several key policy objectives are outlined:

  • AI Litigation Task Force: The Attorney General is directed to establish an AI Litigation Task Force within 30 days to challenge state AI laws inconsistent with the policy, focusing on issues such as interference with interstate commerce and First Amendment concerns.
  • Evaluation of State AI Laws: The Secretary of Commerce is tasked with publishing an evaluation within 90 days, identifying “onerous” state AI laws that should be referred to the AI Litigation Task Force.
  • Restriction on Federal Assistance: Executive departments and agencies will evaluate and condition a state’s eligibility for federal funding based on its alignment with the policy.
  • Federal Reporting and Disclosure Standard: The FCC will initiate a proceeding within 90 days to consider adopting a federal reporting standard for AI models, which would preempt conflicting state laws.
  • FTC Mandate on AI Models: The FTC is directed to issue a policy statement within 90 days regarding the application of the FTC Act to AI models, identifying state laws that may require altering the “truthful outputs” of AI models, with Colorado’s AI Act as a notable example.
  • Legislative Recommendations: The Special Advisor for AI and Cybersecurity and the Assistant to the President for Science and Technology are instructed to prepare legislative recommendations for a uniform federal AI policy framework that would preempt conflicting state laws.

Notably, the Executive Order specifies certain carve-outs, including child safety protections and state government procurement and use of AI.

Implications for AI Developers and Deployers

While the interaction between federal initiatives and existing state requirements remains uncertain, several key takeaways are essential for AI developers and deployers:

  • State AI Law Compliance: Existing state AI laws, such as Colorado’s AI Act and California’s Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act, will likely not be impacted in the short term by Executive Order 14365. Businesses should continue to comply with state AI laws until there is greater clarity.
  • Monitoring Legal Challenges: Active legal developments are expected from both the AI Litigation Task Force and states potentially challenging Executive Order 14365. Key legal debates will likely focus on state authority under the Tenth Amendment, the Dormant Commerce Clause, and the legality of conditioning federal funding on state AI laws.
  • Stakeholder Involvement: Proposed federal reporting and disclosure standards for AI models will undergo a formal rulemaking process, allowing stakeholders to influence policy details.
  • Areas of Growing Regulatory Patchwork: Certain areas, including child safety protection and AI infrastructure, will continue to be governed by a patchwork of evolving state-level regulations, necessitating close monitoring to manage compliance risks.

In conclusion, while Executive Order 14365 aims to streamline federal policy regarding AI, the complexities of state laws and ongoing legal developments will require vigilance from businesses operating within the AI ecosystem.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...