EU’s AI Act: Key Prohibitions Coming into Effect

Understanding the EU’s AI Act: Key Provisions and Implications

The European Union’s AI Act is poised to significantly reshape the landscape of artificial intelligence regulation within its jurisdiction. With its initial provisions set to commence on February 2, 2025, businesses and AI developers must prepare for stringent compliance requirements.

Prohibited AI Practices

At the heart of the AI Act are measures aimed at regulating prohibited AI practices. These practices encompass a range of AI systems deemed to present an unacceptable risk to fundamental rights and EU values. As outlined in Article 5, the following categories are strictly prohibited:

  • Subliminal, manipulative or deceptive techniques
  • Exploiting vulnerable groups that materially distort behavior and risk significant harm
  • Social scoring in specific use cases
  • Predicting criminality based on profiling
  • Web scraping or CCTV for facial recognition databases
  • Interfering with emotions in workplaces or schools
  • Biometric categorization to infer sensitive characteristics such as race, political opinions, or sexual orientation
  • Real-time remote biometric identification in public spaces for law enforcement purposes

While exceptions exist, they are subject to a case-by-case analysis. It is crucial to note that these prohibitions do not replace any other restrictions imposed by existing laws, such as the GDPR and consumer protection regulations.

Consequences of Non-Compliance

The penalties for violating the AI Act are severe, with fines potentially reaching €35 million or 7% of total worldwide annual turnover from the preceding financial year, whichever is higher. Notably, these penalties will take effect on August 2, 2025.

Global Reach of the AI Act

Importantly, the AI Act’s jurisdiction extends beyond the EU borders. AI systems may be subject to its regulations even if they are not marketed or used within the EU, particularly when services are contracted by EU-based operators from third countries. However, exceptions for certain activities such as law enforcement, military defense, and national security apply.

Next Steps for Organizations

Organizations must take immediate action to assess their AI systems for compliance with the AI Act. This involves:

  • Evaluating whether their AI systems fall under the Act’s scope
  • Determining if they are categorized as prohibited practices
  • Tracking updates to the list of prohibitions, as this may evolve over time

The EU’s AI Act represents a significant step toward regulating artificial intelligence, ensuring that its deployment aligns with the fundamental rights of individuals while promoting responsible innovation.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...