EU’s AI Act: Key Prohibitions Coming into Effect

Understanding the EU’s AI Act: Key Provisions and Implications

The European Union’s AI Act is poised to significantly reshape the landscape of artificial intelligence regulation within its jurisdiction. With its initial provisions set to commence on February 2, 2025, businesses and AI developers must prepare for stringent compliance requirements.

Prohibited AI Practices

At the heart of the AI Act are measures aimed at regulating prohibited AI practices. These practices encompass a range of AI systems deemed to present an unacceptable risk to fundamental rights and EU values. As outlined in Article 5, the following categories are strictly prohibited:

  • Subliminal, manipulative or deceptive techniques
  • Exploiting vulnerable groups that materially distort behavior and risk significant harm
  • Social scoring in specific use cases
  • Predicting criminality based on profiling
  • Web scraping or CCTV for facial recognition databases
  • Interfering with emotions in workplaces or schools
  • Biometric categorization to infer sensitive characteristics such as race, political opinions, or sexual orientation
  • Real-time remote biometric identification in public spaces for law enforcement purposes

While exceptions exist, they are subject to a case-by-case analysis. It is crucial to note that these prohibitions do not replace any other restrictions imposed by existing laws, such as the GDPR and consumer protection regulations.

Consequences of Non-Compliance

The penalties for violating the AI Act are severe, with fines potentially reaching €35 million or 7% of total worldwide annual turnover from the preceding financial year, whichever is higher. Notably, these penalties will take effect on August 2, 2025.

Global Reach of the AI Act

Importantly, the AI Act’s jurisdiction extends beyond the EU borders. AI systems may be subject to its regulations even if they are not marketed or used within the EU, particularly when services are contracted by EU-based operators from third countries. However, exceptions for certain activities such as law enforcement, military defense, and national security apply.

Next Steps for Organizations

Organizations must take immediate action to assess their AI systems for compliance with the AI Act. This involves:

  • Evaluating whether their AI systems fall under the Act’s scope
  • Determining if they are categorized as prohibited practices
  • Tracking updates to the list of prohibitions, as this may evolve over time

The EU’s AI Act represents a significant step toward regulating artificial intelligence, ensuring that its deployment aligns with the fundamental rights of individuals while promoting responsible innovation.

More Insights

The Perils of ‘Good Enough’ AI in Compliance

In today's fast-paced world, the allure of 'good enough' AI in compliance can lead to significant legal risks when speed compromises accuracy. Leaders must ensure that AI tools provide explainable...

European Commission Unveils AI Code of Practice for General-Purpose Models

On July 10, 2025, the European Commission published the final version of the General-Purpose AI Code of Practice, which aims to provide a framework for compliance with certain provisions of the EU AI...

EU Introduces New Code to Streamline AI Compliance

The European Union has introduced a voluntary code of practice to assist companies in complying with the upcoming AI Act, which will regulate AI usage across its member states. This code addresses...

Reforming AI Procurement for Government Accountability

This article discusses the importance of procurement processes in the adoption of AI technologies by local governments, highlighting how loopholes can lead to a lack of oversight. It emphasizes the...

Pillar Security Launches Comprehensive AI Security Framework

Pillar Security has developed an AI security framework called the Secure AI Lifecycle Framework (SAIL), aimed at enhancing the industry's approach to AI security through strategy and governance. The...

Tokio Marine Unveils Comprehensive AI Governance Framework

Tokio Marine Holdings has established a formal AI governance framework to guide its global operations in developing and using artificial intelligence. The policy emphasizes transparency, human...

Shadow AI: The Urgent Need for Governance Solutions

Generative AI (GenAI) is rapidly becoming integral to business operations, often without proper oversight or approval, leading to what is termed as Shadow AI. Companies must establish clear governance...

Fragmented Futures: The Battle for AI Regulation

The article discusses the complexities of regulating artificial intelligence (AI) as various countries adopt different approaches to governance, resulting in a fragmented landscape. It explores how...

Fragmented Futures: The Battle for AI Regulation

The article discusses the complexities of regulating artificial intelligence (AI) as various countries adopt different approaches to governance, resulting in a fragmented landscape. It explores how...