EU’s AI Act Bans Emotion Recognition in Workplaces

EU’s New AI Act and Its Implications for Emotion Recognition Systems

The European Union’s recent legislative measure, the AI Act, introduces significant restrictions on the use of emotion recognition systems within workplaces. This act aims to address privacy concerns and potential biases associated with AI-driven emotion detection technologies.

Scope of the Act

The AI Act specifically prohibits AI systems that infer emotions through various means, including keystrokes, body postures, and movements, as these methods rely on biometric data.

The guidelines are crafted to ensure a “consistent, effective, and uniform” application of the AI Act throughout the European Union. Although these guidelines provide insight into how the Commission interprets the prohibitions, they are non-binding, with final interpretations resting with the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).

Emotion Recognition AI Systems

The restrictions extend to the use of emotion recognition AI systems during critical phases such as recruitment and probationary periods. Notable prohibitions include:

  • AI systems monitoring the emotional tone in hybrid work teams, which identify and infer emotions from voice and imagery during video calls.
  • Supermarkets using cameras to gauge employees’ emotions, such as happiness.
  • Call centers employing webcams and voice recognition systems to track emotions.

However, there are exceptions for the deployment of these tools for personal training purposes, provided that data privacy is maintained, and the information does not influence employee assessments or promotions.

Addressing Privacy Risks

The primary aim of the AI Act’s restrictions is to mitigate the privacy risks associated with emotion recognition technologies. Such systems raise ethical concerns due to the diverse ways individuals express emotions across different cultures and contexts. By prohibiting these practices, the legislation seeks to uphold workers’ dignity and prevent discriminatory practices.

Nevertheless, exceptions remain for AI systems employed to monitor emotional states for medical or safety-related purposes. For example, in high-risk environments like factories or construction sites, AI might be utilized to detect signs of stress or burnout, provided that the technology directly relates to employee well-being and safety.

Conclusion

Enacted in August 2024, the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act will be fully applicable by August 2, 2026. The ambition behind this legislative effort is to provide legal certainty for those deploying AI systems in the European market, as well as for market surveillance authorities. Although the guidelines are not legally binding, they represent a significant step toward regulating the use of AI in workplaces, particularly concerning emotional analysis and biometric data.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...