EU’s AI Act Bans Emotion Recognition in Workplaces

EU’s New AI Act and Its Implications for Emotion Recognition Systems

The European Union’s recent legislative measure, the AI Act, introduces significant restrictions on the use of emotion recognition systems within workplaces. This act aims to address privacy concerns and potential biases associated with AI-driven emotion detection technologies.

Scope of the Act

The AI Act specifically prohibits AI systems that infer emotions through various means, including keystrokes, body postures, and movements, as these methods rely on biometric data.

The guidelines are crafted to ensure a “consistent, effective, and uniform” application of the AI Act throughout the European Union. Although these guidelines provide insight into how the Commission interprets the prohibitions, they are non-binding, with final interpretations resting with the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).

Emotion Recognition AI Systems

The restrictions extend to the use of emotion recognition AI systems during critical phases such as recruitment and probationary periods. Notable prohibitions include:

  • AI systems monitoring the emotional tone in hybrid work teams, which identify and infer emotions from voice and imagery during video calls.
  • Supermarkets using cameras to gauge employees’ emotions, such as happiness.
  • Call centers employing webcams and voice recognition systems to track emotions.

However, there are exceptions for the deployment of these tools for personal training purposes, provided that data privacy is maintained, and the information does not influence employee assessments or promotions.

Addressing Privacy Risks

The primary aim of the AI Act’s restrictions is to mitigate the privacy risks associated with emotion recognition technologies. Such systems raise ethical concerns due to the diverse ways individuals express emotions across different cultures and contexts. By prohibiting these practices, the legislation seeks to uphold workers’ dignity and prevent discriminatory practices.

Nevertheless, exceptions remain for AI systems employed to monitor emotional states for medical or safety-related purposes. For example, in high-risk environments like factories or construction sites, AI might be utilized to detect signs of stress or burnout, provided that the technology directly relates to employee well-being and safety.

Conclusion

Enacted in August 2024, the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act will be fully applicable by August 2, 2026. The ambition behind this legislative effort is to provide legal certainty for those deploying AI systems in the European market, as well as for market surveillance authorities. Although the guidelines are not legally binding, they represent a significant step toward regulating the use of AI in workplaces, particularly concerning emotional analysis and biometric data.

More Insights

US Rejects UN’s Call for Global AI Governance Framework

U.S. officials rejected the establishment of a global AI governance framework at the United Nations General Assembly, despite broad support from many nations, including China. Michael Kratsios of the...

Agentic AI: Managing the Risks of Autonomous Systems

As companies increasingly adopt agentic AI systems for autonomous decision-making, they face the emerging challenge of agentic AI sprawl, which can lead to security vulnerabilities and operational...

AI as a New Opinion Gatekeeper: Addressing Hidden Biases

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into sectors like healthcare and finance, a new study highlights the potential for subtle biases in AI systems to distort public...

AI Accountability: A New Era of Regulation and Compliance

The burgeoning world of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is at a critical juncture as regulatory actions signal a new era of accountability and ethical deployment. Recent events highlight the shift...

Choosing Effective AI Governance Tools for Safer Adoption

As generative AI continues to evolve, so do the associated risks, making AI governance tools essential for managing these challenges. This initiative, in collaboration with Tokio Marine Group, aims to...

UN Initiatives for Trustworthy AI Governance

The United Nations is working to influence global policy on artificial intelligence by establishing an expert panel to develop standards for "safe, secure and trustworthy" AI. This initiative aims to...

Data-Driven Governance: Shaping AI Regulation in Singapore

The conversation between Thomas Roehm from SAS and Frankie Phua from United Overseas Bank at the SAS Innovate On Tour in Singapore explores how data-driven regulation can effectively govern rapidly...

Preparing SMEs for EU AI Compliance Challenges

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) must navigate the complexities of the EU AI Act, which categorizes many AI applications as "high-risk" and imposes strict compliance requirements. To adapt...

Draft Guidance on Reporting Serious Incidents Under the EU AI Act

On September 26, 2025, the European Commission published draft guidance on serious incident reporting requirements for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act. Organizations developing or deploying...