EU AI Act Enforces Initial Compliance Requirements

First Requirements of the AI Act Come Into Effect

On February 2, 2025, the first requirements under the European Union AI Act officially came into effect. This landmark legislation includes a ban on the use of AI systems that involve prohibited AI practices and mandates that providers and users of AI systems ensure they possess sufficient AI literacy to effectively operate these technologies.

Pending Guidance from the European Commission

Despite the urgency surrounding the implementation of the Act, guidance from the European Commission is still pending. This has led many companies to independently design and implement their own strategies and compliance plans in the absence of formal directives.

Engagement at Knowledge Sharing Forums

In light of the new regulations, law firms are increasingly engaging in knowledge sharing forums. For instance, Clifford Chance is preparing for the global AI Action Summit in Paris. During the satellite event known as the AI Fringe on February 11, Dessislava Savova, a partner at Clifford Chance, will moderate a discussion focused on delivering trustworthy AI during challenging times. The panel will feature notable experts, including Brendan Kelleher from SoftBank and Laurent Daudet from LightOn.

Timeline of the EU AI Act

The EU AI Act was officially enforced on August 1, 2024, with its requirements being implemented over a staggered timeline. Most provisions are scheduled for implementation by August 2, 2026, affecting any systems utilized within the EU.

Literacy Requirements

The Act stipulates that providers and deployers of AI systems must take appropriate measures to ensure that their staff possess adequate skills, knowledge, and understanding of AI systems. It is crucial that these individuals are aware of the potential risks and harm that AI can cause.

Prohibited AI Practices

Prohibited AI practices are defined as those that are considered harmful and abusive, contradicting the values of the Union, the rule of law, and fundamental rights. The Act bans systems that:

  • Are manipulative or deceptive
  • Exploit vulnerabilities, such as age or socio-economic status
  • Score individuals based on behavior or personality traits
  • Profile individuals to predict criminal behavior
  • Create or expand facial recognition databases through untargeted scraping of the internet and CCTV footage
  • Infer emotions or categorize individuals based on race or political beliefs

Further Reading

For more insights on the bans that came into effect, a paper from Mayer Brown provides additional context and analysis of the EU AI Act and its implications.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...