Emerging National AI Policy: Key Insights for Federal IT Leaders

What Federal IT Leaders Should Know About the Emerging National AI Policy Framework

At the close of 2025, the White House issued an executive order tasking the Commerce Department, the Federal Communications Commission, and others in government to formulate a national policy framework for artificial intelligence (AI). This initiative aims to proactively address the rapidly developing state-level regulatory landscape.

Compliance Challenges for State-Level AI Regulations

In 2025, state legislatures introduced approximately 1,200 AI-related bills, following 635 AI-related bills introduced in 2024, with 99 enacted into law, according to MultiState.ai. The executive order serves as a response to the growing number of state laws, emphasizing the need for a unified national framework.

Ryan Hagemann, global AI policy lead for IBM, notes, “The entire purpose behind this executive order was primarily as a rebuttal to all of the state laws that have been cropping up over the past 18 months or so.” This executive order reiterates the administration’s commitment to establishing a cohesive approach to AI regulation.

Emerging Framework for Data and Security

While the administration is still in the process of formulating the framework, experts predict it will focus on data management and security. The intention is to create guidelines that promote innovation while ensuring the protection of data.

According to experts, the framework will likely address the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data, establishing a structured approach to cybersecurity.

However, significant legislative action is required, as Hagemann points out, “the administration understands that a lot of that heavy lifting actually has to be done by Congress.” The details of the framework will ultimately be determined by congressional legislation.

Preparing for AI Compliance Requirements

Federal agencies can take proactive steps to prepare for upcoming compliance requirements. One effective approach is the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, which provides a robust method for assessing organizational risk management practices.

Agencies should also enhance their data management initiatives, viewing AI compliance through the lens of data governance. Bagley emphasizes that any AI framework will inherently address data governance principles, which are well-established.

Shaping a National AI Policy Outlook

The administration’s consistent messaging emphasizes the need for agencies to utilize new AI tools and innovate responsibly. Potential policy changes may streamline procurement processes, allowing for the quicker adoption of off-the-shelf AI solutions.

Bagley suggests that policies encouraging the use of AI in repeatable and automatable tasks could become a default expectation within federal agencies, aligning with the administration’s goals for enhancing efficiency.

As adversaries evolve, the need for AI-powered cybersecurity will likely become a focus within policy discussions. With data breaches occurring at unprecedented speeds, agencies should explore AI-driven defense solutions to safeguard their data and systems.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...