EDPB and EDPS Call for Stronger Safeguards in EU AI Act Implementation

EDPB and EDPS Joint Opinion on EU AI Act Implementation

On January 21, 2026, the European Data Protection Board (“EDPB”) and the European Data Protection Supervisor (“EDPS”) issued a Joint Opinion in response to the European Commission’s Proposal for the ‘Digital Omnibus on AI’. This proposal aims to facilitate the effective application of harmonized rules under the EU AI Act by streamlining administrative processes for organizations deploying artificial intelligence (“AI”) systems across the EU.

Support for Administrative Simplification

The Joint Opinion reflects broad support for the European Commission’s efforts to address practical challenges organizations face under the AI Act. However, the EDPB and EDPS emphasize that any administrative simplification must not compromise fundamental rights protections.

Key Recommendations

In the Joint Opinion, the EDPB and EDPS highlighted several specific concerns regarding the Proposal and made various recommendations:

  • Processing Special Categories of Data: The proposed extension allowing providers and deployers of AI systems to process sensitive personal data (e.g., ethnicity or health information) for bias detection and correction should be limited to situations where the risk of harm from bias is serious and appropriate safeguards are in place.
  • Registration of High-Risk AI Systems: The removal of the obligation to register AI systems, even if claimed to be ‘non-high risk’, is discouraged. The EDPB and EDPS warn that this could reduce accountability and lead organizations to classify systems as lower risk to avoid public scrutiny.
  • Supervision of Regulatory Sandboxes: While regulatory sandboxes to promote innovation are welcomed, the EDPB and EDPS recommend that competent Data Protection Authorities be directly involved in the supervision and enforcement of data processing within these sandboxes. They also suggest amending the AI Act to grant the EDPB an advisory role on the European Artificial Intelligence Board.
  • Role of the AI Office: The responsibilities of the AI Office in supervising AI systems, especially those based on general-purpose models, must be clearly defined and should not overlap with the independent oversight of AI systems used by EU institutions, which is the responsibility of the EDPS.
  • Market Surveillance Authorities’ Role: The function of Market Surveillance Authorities should be clarified as administrative points of contact, ensuring their roles do not impact the independence or powers of Data Protection Authorities.
  • AI Literacy Responsibilities: Providers and deployers of AI must ensure their staff possess adequate AI literacy. Any new obligations placed on the European Commission or Member States to foster AI literacy should support, not replace, these responsibilities.
  • Postponement of High-Risk AI Provisions: The Joint Opinion expresses concern regarding proposed delays in implementing essential requirements for high-risk AI systems. The EDPB and EDPS urge lawmakers to minimize these delays, especially for critical obligations like transparency requirements, given the rapid pace of AI development.

For further details, you can read the press release here and the full Joint Opinion here.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...