Driving Agentic AI Adoption Through Effective Governance and Security

How Governance and Security Can Drive Agentic AI Adoption

The emergence of shadow risks presents a significant challenge to technology executives, particularly in the realm of artificial intelligence (AI). As businesses increasingly adopt generative AI technologies, the rise of AI agents—autonomous entities capable of decision-making and interaction with critical systems—requires a robust framework of governance and security.

The Challenge of Shadow AI

For years, organizations have grappled with the implications of shadow data, which refers to sensitive business information stored outside formal data management systems. More recently, the focus has shifted to shadow AI, which encompasses unsanctioned AI applications within an enterprise’s IT infrastructure. The latest iteration of this concern is the emergence of shadow AI agents.

As businesses explore the capabilities of AI agents, they unlock significant productivity gains by deploying these tools to handle time-consuming tasks such as troubleshooting IT issues and managing HR workflows. The autonomy of AI agents is a key selling point, allowing them to pursue goals and solve complex tasks independently.

Risks Associated with AI Agent Autonomy

However, the autonomy and accessibility of AI agents also introduce potential risks. When more employees gain access to these tools, the likelihood of unauthorized or untrained use rises. This concern is already evident with AI assistants and chatbots, where sensitive company data can inadvertently be fed into unsanctioned third-party applications, leading to data breaches.

AI agents operate unsupervised within critical infrastructure, increasing the risk of shadow configurations and exposing enterprises to issues such as hallucination, bias, and drift, which can result in severe business repercussions, including reputational damage and compliance violations.

Strategies for Gaining Control

As enterprises faced challenges with shadow data and traditional shadow AI, they adapted rather than halted innovation. This adaptive strategy must continue in the current era of AI agents. The first step to mitigating shadow risks is to enhance visibility into the AI agents operating within the organization. Implementing AI governance and security tools can automatically identify and catalog these applications, eliminating the presence of agents operating in the shadows.

Once identified, AI agents should be integrated into an organizational inventory, aligned with specific use cases, and incorporated into the governance framework. This integration requires conducting risk assessments, compliance assessments, and applying proper controls and guardrails to minimize associated risks.

Ensuring Traceability and Explainability

To effectively manage AI agents, organizations should ensure that their actions are both traceable and explainable. Establishing predetermined thresholds for toxicity and bias is essential to maintaining oversight. Additionally, continuous monitoring of agent outputs for context relevance, query fidelity, and tool selection quality is vital.

Integrating AI Security and Governance

The core of an effective strategy lies in deeply integrating AI security and governance as collaborative disciplines. This integration must occur not only at the software level but also at the personnel level, encouraging regular communication between AI developers and security professionals. Such collaboration is crucial in paving the way for responsible AI adoption and maximizing the benefits of agentic AI.

More Insights

CII Advocates for Strong AI Accountability in Financial Services

The Chartered Insurance Institute (CII) has urged for clear accountability frameworks and a skills strategy for the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in financial services. They emphasize the...

Regulating AI in APAC MedTech: Current Trends and Future Directions

The regulatory landscape for AI-enabled MedTech in the Asia Pacific region is still developing, with existing frameworks primarily governing other technologies. While countries like China, Japan, and...

New York’s AI Legislation: Key Changes Employers Must Know

In early 2025, New York proposed the NY AI Act and the AI Consumer Protection Act to regulate the use of artificial intelligence, particularly addressing algorithmic discrimination in employment...

Managing AI Risks: Effective Frameworks for Safe Implementation

This article discusses the importance of AI risk management frameworks to mitigate potential risks associated with artificial intelligence systems. It highlights various types of risks, including...

Essential Insights on the EU Artificial Intelligence Act for Tech Companies

The European Union has introduced the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), which aims to manage the risks and opportunities associated with AI technologies across Europe. This landmark regulation...

South Korea’s Landmark AI Basic Act: A New Era of Regulation

South Korea has established itself as a leader in AI regulation in Asia with the introduction of the AI Basic Act, which creates a comprehensive legal framework for artificial intelligence. This...

EU AI Act and DORA: Mastering Compliance in Financial Services

The EU AI Act and DORA are reshaping how financial entities manage AI risk by introducing new layers of compliance that demand transparency, accountability, and quantifiable risk assessments...

AI Governance: Bridging the Transatlantic Divide

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping economies, societies, and global governance, presenting both significant opportunities and risks. This chapter examines the divergent approaches of...

EU’s Ambitious Plan to Boost AI Development

The EU Commission is launching a new strategy to reduce barriers for the deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) across Europe, aiming to enhance the region's competitiveness on a global scale. The...