Driving Agentic AI Adoption Through Effective Governance and Security

How Governance and Security Can Drive Agentic AI Adoption

The emergence of shadow risks presents a significant challenge to technology executives, particularly in the realm of artificial intelligence (AI). As businesses increasingly adopt generative AI technologies, the rise of AI agents—autonomous entities capable of decision-making and interaction with critical systems—requires a robust framework of governance and security.

The Challenge of Shadow AI

For years, organizations have grappled with the implications of shadow data, which refers to sensitive business information stored outside formal data management systems. More recently, the focus has shifted to shadow AI, which encompasses unsanctioned AI applications within an enterprise’s IT infrastructure. The latest iteration of this concern is the emergence of shadow AI agents.

As businesses explore the capabilities of AI agents, they unlock significant productivity gains by deploying these tools to handle time-consuming tasks such as troubleshooting IT issues and managing HR workflows. The autonomy of AI agents is a key selling point, allowing them to pursue goals and solve complex tasks independently.

Risks Associated with AI Agent Autonomy

However, the autonomy and accessibility of AI agents also introduce potential risks. When more employees gain access to these tools, the likelihood of unauthorized or untrained use rises. This concern is already evident with AI assistants and chatbots, where sensitive company data can inadvertently be fed into unsanctioned third-party applications, leading to data breaches.

AI agents operate unsupervised within critical infrastructure, increasing the risk of shadow configurations and exposing enterprises to issues such as hallucination, bias, and drift, which can result in severe business repercussions, including reputational damage and compliance violations.

Strategies for Gaining Control

As enterprises faced challenges with shadow data and traditional shadow AI, they adapted rather than halted innovation. This adaptive strategy must continue in the current era of AI agents. The first step to mitigating shadow risks is to enhance visibility into the AI agents operating within the organization. Implementing AI governance and security tools can automatically identify and catalog these applications, eliminating the presence of agents operating in the shadows.

Once identified, AI agents should be integrated into an organizational inventory, aligned with specific use cases, and incorporated into the governance framework. This integration requires conducting risk assessments, compliance assessments, and applying proper controls and guardrails to minimize associated risks.

Ensuring Traceability and Explainability

To effectively manage AI agents, organizations should ensure that their actions are both traceable and explainable. Establishing predetermined thresholds for toxicity and bias is essential to maintaining oversight. Additionally, continuous monitoring of agent outputs for context relevance, query fidelity, and tool selection quality is vital.

Integrating AI Security and Governance

The core of an effective strategy lies in deeply integrating AI security and governance as collaborative disciplines. This integration must occur not only at the software level but also at the personnel level, encouraging regular communication between AI developers and security professionals. Such collaboration is crucial in paving the way for responsible AI adoption and maximizing the benefits of agentic AI.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...