Driving Agentic AI Adoption Through Effective Governance and Security

How Governance and Security Can Drive Agentic AI Adoption

The emergence of shadow risks presents a significant challenge to technology executives, particularly in the realm of artificial intelligence (AI). As businesses increasingly adopt generative AI technologies, the rise of AI agents—autonomous entities capable of decision-making and interaction with critical systems—requires a robust framework of governance and security.

The Challenge of Shadow AI

For years, organizations have grappled with the implications of shadow data, which refers to sensitive business information stored outside formal data management systems. More recently, the focus has shifted to shadow AI, which encompasses unsanctioned AI applications within an enterprise’s IT infrastructure. The latest iteration of this concern is the emergence of shadow AI agents.

As businesses explore the capabilities of AI agents, they unlock significant productivity gains by deploying these tools to handle time-consuming tasks such as troubleshooting IT issues and managing HR workflows. The autonomy of AI agents is a key selling point, allowing them to pursue goals and solve complex tasks independently.

Risks Associated with AI Agent Autonomy

However, the autonomy and accessibility of AI agents also introduce potential risks. When more employees gain access to these tools, the likelihood of unauthorized or untrained use rises. This concern is already evident with AI assistants and chatbots, where sensitive company data can inadvertently be fed into unsanctioned third-party applications, leading to data breaches.

AI agents operate unsupervised within critical infrastructure, increasing the risk of shadow configurations and exposing enterprises to issues such as hallucination, bias, and drift, which can result in severe business repercussions, including reputational damage and compliance violations.

Strategies for Gaining Control

As enterprises faced challenges with shadow data and traditional shadow AI, they adapted rather than halted innovation. This adaptive strategy must continue in the current era of AI agents. The first step to mitigating shadow risks is to enhance visibility into the AI agents operating within the organization. Implementing AI governance and security tools can automatically identify and catalog these applications, eliminating the presence of agents operating in the shadows.

Once identified, AI agents should be integrated into an organizational inventory, aligned with specific use cases, and incorporated into the governance framework. This integration requires conducting risk assessments, compliance assessments, and applying proper controls and guardrails to minimize associated risks.

Ensuring Traceability and Explainability

To effectively manage AI agents, organizations should ensure that their actions are both traceable and explainable. Establishing predetermined thresholds for toxicity and bias is essential to maintaining oversight. Additionally, continuous monitoring of agent outputs for context relevance, query fidelity, and tool selection quality is vital.

Integrating AI Security and Governance

The core of an effective strategy lies in deeply integrating AI security and governance as collaborative disciplines. This integration must occur not only at the software level but also at the personnel level, encouraging regular communication between AI developers and security professionals. Such collaboration is crucial in paving the way for responsible AI adoption and maximizing the benefits of agentic AI.

More Insights

US Rejects UN’s Call for Global AI Governance Framework

U.S. officials rejected the establishment of a global AI governance framework at the United Nations General Assembly, despite broad support from many nations, including China. Michael Kratsios of the...

Agentic AI: Managing the Risks of Autonomous Systems

As companies increasingly adopt agentic AI systems for autonomous decision-making, they face the emerging challenge of agentic AI sprawl, which can lead to security vulnerabilities and operational...

AI as a New Opinion Gatekeeper: Addressing Hidden Biases

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into sectors like healthcare and finance, a new study highlights the potential for subtle biases in AI systems to distort public...

AI Accountability: A New Era of Regulation and Compliance

The burgeoning world of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is at a critical juncture as regulatory actions signal a new era of accountability and ethical deployment. Recent events highlight the shift...

Choosing Effective AI Governance Tools for Safer Adoption

As generative AI continues to evolve, so do the associated risks, making AI governance tools essential for managing these challenges. This initiative, in collaboration with Tokio Marine Group, aims to...

UN Initiatives for Trustworthy AI Governance

The United Nations is working to influence global policy on artificial intelligence by establishing an expert panel to develop standards for "safe, secure and trustworthy" AI. This initiative aims to...

Data-Driven Governance: Shaping AI Regulation in Singapore

The conversation between Thomas Roehm from SAS and Frankie Phua from United Overseas Bank at the SAS Innovate On Tour in Singapore explores how data-driven regulation can effectively govern rapidly...

Preparing SMEs for EU AI Compliance Challenges

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) must navigate the complexities of the EU AI Act, which categorizes many AI applications as "high-risk" and imposes strict compliance requirements. To adapt...

Draft Guidance on Reporting Serious Incidents Under the EU AI Act

On September 26, 2025, the European Commission published draft guidance on serious incident reporting requirements for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act. Organizations developing or deploying...